Kinetic IV wrote:Coming right after a great post about AntiM anything you say is going to look bad so I might as well spit out the disgust I have about how this came to be. I thought....key word is thought....that the end users of this board had a say on how it was run. ...
How about balancing this out by letting the community pick one more person to help out, giving the board 4 moderators...
I just got a concern from Chai that it not be a popularity game, I didnt think of that. Anyone think of a way to make sure that does not happen? Because honestly, I think its a valid and reasonable thing to do if the people here could pull it off. I would honestly like to see it work because it would be an important step in this board being able to run and represent itself.
Captain Fuckwit wrote:If you can allow me "moderator" priviledges for three (3) threads of my naming, I can return to you one (1) highly successful thread in terms of clarity, content and brevity. When I deliver the thread to you after ten (10) months, I'll tell you how I did it! (3/23/05)
The only people who should be moderators on Eplaya would be those people who nominate themselves.
My philosophies, with regards to matters of the edit button, deleting threads, and censorship, have all been laid out solely within the Eplaya Feedback section. This being my 27th post, you should be well aware that I have created my entire unique entity, so far, in under 27 posts, demonstrating discernment and focus.
Captain Fuckwit wrote:I'm a very intelligent person. I know when I am on-topic. I should not be required to always be on topic with laser-like precision...
DVD Burner wrote:organization as large as 40,000 strong without having some differences.
spectabillis wrote:DVD Burner wrote:organization as large as 40,000 strong without having some differences.
of course not, but you are comparing this board to the event. people act much differently here than they do at the event, especially in what they say to each other as opposed to saying it to someones face, that should be obvious.
DVD Burner wrote:it is up to you to make the first step to find what it is that others may be trying to express to you.
spectabillis wrote:DVD Burner wrote:it is up to you to make the first step to find what it is that others may be trying to express to you.
And its up to you. I hope no one is going to fool themselves by thinking everyone is going to agree - thats impossible.
Chai Guy wrote:Unfortunately, this isn't a democracy, and if you think Spec, Emily or I are part of the ruling class, you should go talk to Technopatra and ask who's in charge here.
Chai Guy wrote:I miss Technopatra on this board.
Me too my friend, me too.
<a little tear runs down Chai's face>
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest