Bob wrote:Exodus 22:6
If fire break out, and catch in thorns, so that the stacks of corn, or the standing corn, or the field, be consumed therewith; he that kindled the fire shall surely make restitution.Psalm 74:7,8
They have cast fire into thy sanctuary, they have defiled by casting down the dwelling place of thy name to the ground. They said in their hearts, Let us destroy them together: they have burned up all the synagogues of God in the land.
If not, that's evidence of endangering others right there.
spectabillis wrote:anyone know what he's specifically chaged with? i have been constantly searching for references but cant find any.
Finnegan wrote:Are you really arguing that because nobody was actually killed and or spindled and mutilated, that "there was no crime"?
Are you arguing that there was no danger of anyone being seriously injured, and therefore, it was not a crime? That has been debunked already, by witnesses.
And please don't call homeland brownshirt security! It's not terrism, but it certainly is felony arson.
spectabillis wrote:i would think this is evident, but if people were not put in serious harms way then there isnt a crime.
Rat Bastard wrote:He still can't seem to grasp that no conviction has been passed and no sentence has been given.
If we used Spectabillis' logic, we would stop searching for Bin Laden cause, really they would knock it down later anyway.
Rat Bastard wrote:I would suggest you re-read your OWN posts Specta. Then comment on why everyone has had something to say about you.
Kinetic V wrote:A very interesting 17:39 clip...
This clip offers a backstory that was missing..or that I had chose to ignore.
I wonder if anyone else will sit through it...and will their mind be open when they do it. And let me put it this way...I hope he wins his lawsuit. It makes sense.
Edit: 15:50 seconds into the clip....listen. Crude Awakening was good, but it didn't rise to the level of being main event status.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest