Chimp wrote:Dear mother of God!! Your spelling is a real fucking shocker Allanon2.
I mean c'mon sunshine, it's fucking useless. Make a bit more bloody effort. Paying attention? Right then...
I before E except after C...sorry, too advanced?
Perhaps we should begin with a run through the alphabet...
A B C D E F G...oh you know that you say, okay then...
Spell the following word, what has wings and flies?
B_ _ D
NO NO NO!!!! Its not BURD, stupid boy,
Oh, I give up.
so what facts woudl you like discussed?
Badger wrote:so what facts woudl you like discussed?
No discussion. Thank you. Your sleazoid, round about way of initiating the thread(s) already suggests to this reader that facts are the last fucking thing you want discussed here.
questions yes i want them.
How about just coming out and discussing your agenda.
Though I suspect not many here would agree with it you'd at least have the comfort of knowing that you initiated it honestly rather than follow through with your spineless, coward's dialogue.
my agenda is for peopel to be aware of what the truth is
be open minded
i was their in 1989or was it 1990 when burning man first went to the pliya. i was with john law and the san francisco cacophony society first went to blackrock.
I was the one who ran the san francisco cacopohony soceities BBS from aroudn 1990 to 1992 i think.
so yes i know what i am talkign about
so just ask. or are you afraid of the truth? are you afraid that your house of cards in your mind will fall down?
And it is spineless BTW.
So now what? Are you folks going to hypercriticize the proposed solutions? Be quiet and hope they go away? What's the next move?
bushonk wrote:why bother with a proposal for a solution to the problem? The site is stopburningman.org It seems that since the site went up, it was intended more to rally the troops behind a force to stop burningman. There was no intention (based on the content of the site) implied of fixing any of the problems that you mention. It also seems that now that that idea has not produced the intended results, you're changing the mission of stopburningman.org. I didn't care to fully believe that you had an unbiased opinion in your earliest days, nor do I believe that now. In fact, I'm pretty much done visiting the site, as you seem to update it to back up your views on this forum.
and if you want proff does that not mean thta we have to show it?
Users browsing this forum: Ulisse and 4 guests