precipitate wrote:And this relates to why you use sockpuppets how?
If you want to stir shit with me, use your PM button.
No this has nothing to do with socks. but I see you dont get that.
pheonixphire000 wrote:I don't understand why someone would have a sock puppet. Why can't you just say what you have to say and then deal with the consequences. I have also seen people have arguments with themselves or just talk with themselves on the eplaya. What is the point of this? It just seems silly to me. Just my personal opinion.
Chai Guy wrote:DVD Burner wrote:No this has nothing to do with socks. but I see you dont get that.
This is a continuation from here. as far as socks goes, so you and Trey dont use them. so what. Badger does, many people do so what.
no need to get into that with you. way too silly. even though this "do as I say not as I do" attitude really needs to stop.
best way is you not say anything to me anymore. you as far as i'm concerned are not important to me. You dont impress me.
I've done my part. Eplay has several plonkers, I.P. trackers, blah blah blah.
Just take care of your end and we'll be done with each other.
dont bother me and I wont bother you. I prefer watching the newbies handle you.
Of course not, why would you post a comment about sock puppets to a thread titled "Sockpuppets" that would be ridiculous!
My take on sockpuppets:
The few people that have socks and are "out" about them don't really bother me. I find Isotopia's posts hilarious, and I don't think they would be as funny coming from Badger even though everyone knows they are the same person.
What I find annoying is the people who use their socks as "yes" puppets, or people who feel that by having a sock they are some how more intelligent than the rest of us (why? Because we didn't figure it out? Maybe we just don't care!)
Chai Guy wrote:I find Isotopia's posts hilarious, and I don't think they would be as funny coming from Badger even though everyone knows they are the same person.
FWIW, I've seen not much since the changeover that would lead me to suggest evicting anyone aside from the [other person's name][obscene reference] character, but I don't read everything. Not seeing the full record, including complaints to the admin, I'd trust tp's judgment.
Fake identities in general (other than recognizable "playa" names), along with no personal info linked from a profile or able to be gleaned from posting history, automatically lead me to take postings under those names with a 100g grain of salt. Readers who cannot distinguish the few kooks, crackpots & malicious trolls from more sincere contributors, and can't avoid overreacting to the benefit of no one, perhaps deserve to get sucked in, IMO.
DVD Burner wrote:....that's why I kept the whole quote in tact....
And I see you didn't get it either though I can see how that could happen when you read only what you want to read. that's why I kept the whole quote in tact. I'll let you figure it out. (even though you already showed that you did'nt get it. That does'nt mean anything about your level of intellegence
We do? I must've missed that memo....
Chai Guy wrote:Honestly, I read the whole thing before I posted, then I read your quote above and so I went back and I re-read it, and I still have no idea. I rarely understand what it is that you are trying to get across and I make it a point to try to understand everyone. My only guess is that you really don't care or want people to understand you, if you did you might consider changing your posting style a little.
precipitate wrote:> No this has nothing to do with socks. but I see you dont get that
Begging pardon, Tony, but this thread has nothing to do with anything but
If you wish to continue to post non-responsive answers, fine. But know that
it's really fucking annoying. Which, I'm sure, is why you do it.
precipitate wrote:> We do? I must've missed that memo....
And that happens, too. It's here.
precipitate wrote:Done. You win, asshole.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests