Kinetic IV wrote:Commerce:
spectabillis wrote:Kinetic IV wrote:Commerce:
Ok, so I went through three links and...
posted before? there is only one post listed for that user and I dont see the previous referance, just links to topics with posts from you.
but yes, its commerce.
Just want to say that it got to the top again because someone wanted to support the work that Crimson and LadyBee had done for them over the years. I suppose that's one reason why I'd prefer freezing to deleting. So that the censorship thing doesn't come up too strongly and with that thread we now have at least one (I didn't reread all the old posts) spontanious rebuttal from someone who's not a high posting board member. I think that speaks well of us. YMMV.Chai Guy wrote:Agree, delete and delete the poster.
Might I also suggest not feeding trolls and bumping their posts back up to the top?
I'm okay with leaving them as they are. I think we're stuck with them, they have a bee in thier collective bonnet and I don't think they're going to go away even if we do firmly show them the door. Also new people coming in don't seem to have a problem going to the website and seeing through its agenda. They're kind of like the Keystone Protesters, not quite competent and worth keeping an eye on.Kinetic IV wrote:But here's the flipside. This was an attack against an LLC member that was hosted on an LLC funded webserver. If this thread is frozen / deleted could the same precedent be used to squelch the Stop BM people who use the same LLC funded webserver to launch their attacks against the event? Not long after the Stop BM folks came on board and started their ruckus I felt they should have been frozen out...could that issue be revisited?
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 0 guests