1durphul wrote:Just out of curiosity, what's happening with that lawsuit against Pershing County? What is the next step, and when is it happening?
It's kind of amazing to me how slow these things move...
Rice wrote:1durphul wrote:Just out of curiosity, what's happening with that lawsuit against Pershing County? What is the next step, and when is it happening?
It's kind of amazing to me how slow these things move...
My experience with the USA legal system is basically non-existent - I do know that law-suits take time, lots of time. There is a website http://brcvpc.com/ which has (as far as I am aware) all the available info.
Hope that helps your curiosity...
1durphul wrote:Rice wrote:1durphul wrote:Just out of curiosity, what's happening with that lawsuit against Pershing County? What is the next step, and when is it happening?
It's kind of amazing to me how slow these things move...
My experience with the USA legal system is basically non-existent - I do know that law-suits take time, lots of time. There is a website http://brcvpc.com/ which has (as far as I am aware) all the available info.
Hope that helps your curiosity...
Sadly it doesn't appear to have been updated since August, and there were things that happened in October according to Google (Pershing failed to dismiss). If it had been kept up to date that would have been a really useful website! Oh well....
theCryptofishist wrote:We had another thread on this recently...
“We’re taking a hard look. We’re not paying for this,” Pershing County Dist. Atty. Jim Shirley told the Los Angeles Times. “We’ll hand the whole thing over to the Bureau of Land Management, if that’s what they want.”
Elliot wrote:Now, this Mr. Shirley seems a bit inconsistent, but...“We’re taking a hard look. We’re not paying for this,” Pershing County Dist. Atty. Jim Shirley told the Los Angeles Times. “We’ll hand the whole thing over to the Bureau of Land Management, if that’s what they want.”
...did he not just propose a splendid solution to the situation?
.
Shambala wrote:...
Republican Assemblyman Ira Hansen of Sparks says the bill undermines county authority and makes funding law enforcement difficult for counties.
...................................................lucky420 wrote:This bill was originated by two of our cow counties legislators. The original intent was to keep counties from imposing extra fees to ranchers who have BLM permits for grazing.
After the bill was amended to include events, festivals the 2 original legislators switched sidesgo figure...
A solution, he (prosecutor Shirley) suggested, would be to make festival-goers exempt from all laws.
"This would ensure that whatever happens, small rural counties will not have to bear the burden of prosecuting state criminal violations which occur as a direct and proximate result of the large outdoor assembly occurring within a particular county," he wrote to lawmakers.
Return to Politics & Philosophy
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests