knowmad wrote:I wonder....
Police departments and the military are pretty adamant about prosecuting assault on one of their service animals to the point of referring to the Animal as "officer so-n-so". they use these honorifics in court to add weight to the heinousness of crime committed and to give a human face to the victim.
Actually.. you're on to something here. A drug dog is indeed referred to and subject to the same protection as an officer. Thus.. if you say that you don't consent to a search, this can be inferred to the dog as well since the dog is looked at as an "officer". If they didn't have probable cause for an officer to search, then they don't have probable cause for a dog to search since dog=officer. This is how many cases get thrown out.

