

Ugly Dougly wrote:Finally a self-portrait.





an ad from Time Jan 21, 2013 wrote:Stretch. Strengthen.
As you get older, smart moves to make.



Pragmatism begins with the idea that belief is that upon which one is willing to act. It holds that a proposition's meaning is the consequent form of conduct or practice that would be implied by accepting the proposition as true.
In "How to Make Our Ideas Clear" Peirce argued for pragmatism as summed up in that which he later called the pragmatic maxim: "Consider what effects, that might conceivably have practical bearings, we conceive the object of our conception to have. Then, our conception of these effects is the whole of our conception of the object".
In his 1910 Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking, James paraphrased Peirce's pragmatic maxim as follows:
“[T]he tangible fact at the root of all our thought-distinctions, however subtle, is that there is no one of them so fine as to consist in anything but a possible difference of practice. To attain perfect clearness in our thoughts of an object, then, we need only consider what conceivable effects of a practical kind the object may involve — what sensations we are to expect from it, and what reactions we must prepare."

Legislature's capacity to produce immanently applicable statute in interstate circumstances such as to lead a reasonable person of reasonable intelligence to rely on a course of action that supports the existance of a valid marriage...
The opinion of the Court of Appeal of the State of California in re marriage JOSEPH S. and TANYA M. CATARELLA: "Most importantly, a marriage ceremony culminated in the parties declaration that they accepted each other as husband and wife. ... Common sense and tradition tells us this is the moment at which the parties' valid consent creates a marriage. ... Sections of the statutory scheme support our conclusion a marriage was valid ... despite a failure to register"
"Under Nevada law, as under California law, a ... license issued by the state is an absolute prerequisite to marriage." - Los Angeles Superior Court on GAFFNEY vs. FREY

transeunt:

the fire elf wrote:
Return to Experiences at Burning Man
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests