theCryptofishist wrote:Shambala wrote:Anyone who would set an occupied structure on fire would be considered mentally ill.
No, some people are just that nasty. And others can do all sorts of vile stuff in wartime. (And maybe they come out of that mentally ill, but maybe not.)
As for the rest, I think you really did not understand what I was saying, but I don't want to argue the point...
Knowmad, will you give me a hug?
...................................................gyre wrote:People that were there say that Paul and others warned them before and after the fire started to get out of the structure.
I'm not sure how the structure was configured, but it seems the law was misapplied, being intended for people deliberately or carelessly trapping people in a building, which does happen.
Corvus wrote:I was not on playa so have no personal knowledge, but people I trust say that was not the case. One said a person in the pavillion had to be roused from deep sleep and another dragged out unconscious (from being altered, not from smoke or anything).
No attempt by Paul or his friends to warn of the danger was in evidence.
Corvus wrote:gyre wrote:People that were there say that Paul and others warned them before and after the fire started to get out of the structure.
I'm not sure how the structure was configured, but it seems the law was misapplied, being intended for people deliberately or carelessly trapping people in a building, which does happen.
I was not on playa so have no personal knowledge, but people I trust say that was not the case. One said a person in the pavillion had to be roused from deep sleep and another dragged out unconscious (from being altered, not from smoke or anything). No attempt by Paul or his friends to warn of the danger was in evidence.
Bob wrote:Call me puzzled at the flood of crocodile tears over a psychopath.
MyDearFriend wrote:I can't believe I'm taking shit from a meat-cake-with-teeth. :lol:
BBadger wrote:I really only pity the people who were attached to Addis--that he selfishly left behind.

Bob wrote:Call me puzzled at the flood of crocodile tears over a psychopath.
Bob wrote:Call me puzzled at the flood of crocodile tears over a psychopath.
...................................................Shambala wrote:Why is it so difficult to muster a shred of compassion and empathy in a case where someone was so distressed that they took their own life? Why?
I was not very happy at the early burn, and the smiling, painted mugshot didn't help garner any sympathy for his cause. It much more than extreme performance art that took place that fateful night, it was extreme mental distress.
We all get just one shot at this amazing thing called life. It's a smörgåsbord filled with colors, smells, visions and tastes that no one should want to cut short. When this happens to someone, it's just a very tragic situation.
From any angle you look at this, I really hope his soul is at peace.
wh..sh wrote:I am not sure why we insist that everyone must empathize.
Empthy only comes through some form of similar, emotional experience. It cannot be taught.
Until each of us have experienced somethings for ourselves, we will only have sympathy.
That said -
I see no merit in judging someone who is dead and calling him names. It's appalling! As I see it, none of you knew him personally.
As tempting as it might be, sometimes it's OK to NOT have an opinion about every single, damn thing in the world.
MyDearFriend wrote:I can't believe I'm taking shit from a meat-cake-with-teeth. :lol:
As Internet rumors go, it was pretty ominous. A Tribe.net poster with the prosaic moniker “1 Man, 1 Gallon” called for a “spontaneous” mob of jades and firebugs to turn out Wednesday night, each armed with a galllon of ad-hoc accelerant, soak the Man down and burn him in advance of his scheduled immolation on Saturday. This “people’s movement” would return Burning Man to its roots in raw anarchy and primordial chaos while cocking a populist snook at the “Disneyized” nature of the event. If an artist, Ranger or beer-addled ticketholder got cooked in the carnage, so much, it would seem, the better. Last night’s duststorm lent cover to the death of this Internet insurrection. At the appointed hour last night, BRC Rangers were more concerned about trying to get a satellite fix on the all-but-invisible Man, than in protecting the structure from a horde of yahoos sloshing buckets of paint thinner across the playa. There was a local lightning-suppression water truck on hand and Ranger Marker assured the Beacon that his organization “always takes these threats seriously.” The Man will burn on Saturday night as scheduled. No time for Gonzo.

Kinetic V wrote:Arson is still arson.
The State of Nevada made sure justice was indeed served and that Mr. Addis served an appropriate sentence.
As a Nevada taxpayer, I consider the cost of his 3 hots and a cot a worthy expense and good use of my tax dollars.
As for his state of mental health, yes it's a shame he committed suicide.
It's also a damn shame he put a commuter rail line out of service impacting hundreds to possibly thousands of people.
It's a shame he traumatized others over and over and over again all the way to the end.
It's a damn shame the man didn't take advantage of the many mental health resources that are out there. There is help. Been there, done that, and so I can speak from experience. You can turn things around, get your head out of your ass, and rebuild your life.
While I have sympathy for his family and the private hell they are going through, I can imagine that more than one of them is feeling a sigh of relief that their nightmare is over.
Goodbye Mr. Addis. And good riddance.
MyDearFriend wrote:I can't believe I'm taking shit from a meat-cake-with-teeth. :lol:
Users browsing this forum: Thecatman, unjonharley and 3 guests