Ugly Dougly wrote:Well, sorry, our great land will take decades to get back to the prosperity and respect that it once had. Maybe. That's only if we citizens suddenly stopped fighting each other and worked together to heal our country.
BBadger wrote:.... I don't think four years is long enough to really see what a president can do. The first half of the term is the president getting up to speed on being the president, the second half is fighting the other party to earn a second election. .... Hell, two terms may not be enough.
I'd actually prefer to have presidential terms be 8-years long, ....
Elliot wrote:BBadger wrote:.... I don't think four years is long enough to really see what a president can do. The first half of the term is the president getting up to speed on being the president, the second half is fighting the other party to earn a second election. .... Hell, two terms may not be enough.
I'd actually prefer to have presidential terms be 8-years long, ....
Hear, hear! I've always felt that it must surely take at least four years to learn the World's most difficult job. So any president deserves the chance to work without the pressure of reelection -- to take the gloves off and put his ideas into effect without having to worry about stepping on some toes.
ygmir wrote:Imagine 8 years of LBJ, or Carter!
Dr. Pyro wrote:ygmir wrote:Imagine 8 years of LBJ, or Carter!
Jesus Yggy, I haven't eaten yet.
Dr. Pyro wrote:http://www.snopes.com/politics/taxes/debtfree.asp
If this isn't enough to make you vote against the moron currently in the White House, or vote Democratic at all (assuming you have a job, earn a paycheck, and pay taxes; if that's not you, then Obama's your guy) then I don't know what will.
ygmir wrote:Jeebus Dougly........funny yes.......but you decry how we need to come together, then disseminate hyperbole such as this.
it's the fringe crap, that keeps anyone from wanting to take to the other side........they see "the other side" as what is portrayed in this sort of stuff.............again, you on the left, have no moral high ground to stand on, when it comes to politicking.......
Ugly Dougly wrote:Our republic was forged through compromise. It's not a dirty word...
Let me pour a round of beers to help us forget our insignificant differences.
Ugly Dougly wrote:ygmir wrote:Jeebus Dougly........funny yes.......but you decry how we need to come together, then disseminate hyperbole such as this.
it's the fringe crap, that keeps anyone from wanting to take to the other side........they see "the other side" as what is portrayed in this sort of stuff.............again, you on the left, have no moral high ground to stand on, when it comes to politicking.......
I never said there was no difference between DEM and GOP. No, Mister Obama is not perfect, the democratic party is not perfect, nor is my country. Teddy Roosevelt is long gone!
But we can do this without accusing each other and our candidates of being morons or communists or fascists or .... good lord! .... hippies!
Our republic was forged through compromise. It's not a dirty word...
Anyway, the others are probably right, we're not going to convert ANYONE with this crap. Let me pour a round of beers to help us forget our insignificant differences.
ygmir wrote:but it's gotten to the point, where each side has swung so far from center

pink wrote:Dr. Pyro wrote:http://www.snopes.com/politics/taxes/debtfree.asp
If this isn't enough to make you vote against the moron currently in the White House, or vote Democratic at all (assuming you have a job, earn a paycheck, and pay taxes; if that's not you, then Obama's your guy) then I don't know what will.
Why is a rumor spread by tea party idiots a reason to vote against Obama? I fail to see your reasoning here. And no, I don't have a job, I have a small business. With payroll tax, I pay a marginal rate of 40% federal tax. And as someone in the finance end of things, you can be assured I pay close attention to tax and economic issues, proposals, bills and all the rest with an extremely educated eye and analysis. The debt crisis we are now in was predicted by the GAO 11 years ago when analyzing the effects of Bush the Younger's tax cuts-effects made only worse by two unfunded, off-budget wars.

jkisha wrote:ygmir wrote:but it's gotten to the point, where each side has swung so far from center
That is not true. Do some research and you'll find that it is the right that has gone to the extreme right and the left has actually moved more towards past center to the right. That is a fact.
ygmir wrote:ah, but in many ways, the electoral college, is a fail safe, for stupidity and fraud.
I only know of one instance, it didn't exactly follow the popular ( each voter), choice, and that was Kennedy vs Nixon.
But, it is a stop, and reality check against "mass hysteria"........think of Hitler, getting elected in Germany in the 30's.......with an electoral college in place, there would at least have been a "chance" that they saw through him, and voted the other way.
It has not harmed us, in any way, IMHO.
we have such a huge population, voter fraud is more the concern, I'd say...and even at that, can you really buy or invent, enough votes? I think that is moot.
And don't kid yourself, both sides do it, differing methods, same results.
Whether it's "vote early, vote often, breathing or not" in Chicago,
to untraceable voters for Loretta Sanchez, when she ousted Bob Dournan in Orange county, here......
it's corrupt, it's broken.........quit putting lipstick on the pig!!!
Call em out, kick 'em out, and re-boot the thugs!!!
*steps down off soapbox*
jkisha wrote:pink wrote:Dr. Pyro wrote:http://www.snopes.com/politics/taxes/debtfree.asp
If this isn't enough to make you vote against the moron currently in the White House, or vote Democratic at all (assuming you have a job, earn a paycheck, and pay taxes; if that's not you, then Obama's your guy) then I don't know what will.
Why is a rumor spread by tea party idiots a reason to vote against Obama? I fail to see your reasoning here. And no, I don't have a job, I have a small business. With payroll tax, I pay a marginal rate of 40% federal tax. And as someone in the finance end of things, you can be assured I pay close attention to tax and economic issues, proposals, bills and all the rest with an extremely educated eye and analysis. The debt crisis we are now in was predicted by the GAO 11 years ago when analyzing the effects of Bush the Younger's tax cuts-effects made only worse by two unfunded, off-budget wars.
I was thinking the same thing. And I too am a business owner, but luckily pay less taxes than you do?
ygmir wrote:But we can do this without accusing each other and our candidates of being morons or communists or fascists or .... good lord! .... hippies!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest