

jerroc wrote:Its seems a law was passed alowing police to arrest possible nudist or what is perceived as a luied act. The law is being challenged because due process was violated. It's unclear to me if Pershing county will enforce the new rule or wait for the outcome of the challenge. I have not Seen BM post anything other than nothing will change this year.
steve.t.sullivan wrote:jerroc wrote:Its seems a law was passed alowing police to arrest possible nudist or what is perceived as a luied act. The law is being challenged because due process was violated. It's unclear to me if Pershing county will enforce the new rule or wait for the outcome of the challenge. I have not Seen BM post anything other than nothing will change this year.
Which law would that be? What's your source?
CitizenRandom wrote:I call BULLSHIT
but i must say nudity seemed to be waaaaaaay down. I think i only saw like three tits and two were mine.
pink wrote:Most of my camp was naked most of the time. While setting up I thought we should just change the name to 'Naked Guy Camp'.
VultureChow wrote:Not a problem. I'll start crocheting
Also I'm willing to loan out my pecker pack for anyone who misses shirtcocking:
The sack is filled with jelly beans.
trilobyte wrote:The lawsuit between Burning Man and Pershing county is not expected to have any affect on this year's event, regardless of the outcome. Relevant updates would be posted on the Burning Blog as well as covered in the Jack Rabbit Speaks newsletter.
sandfly wrote:Trilobyte: I admire your optimism. This August there'll apparently be cops from Pershing County at BRC. There's a new Pershing County ordinance aimed at banning nudity at BRC. If the ordinance is upheld, I don't see why those cops (& maybe others) would not enforce it.
Return to Politics & Philosophy
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests