this made me smile
fears quelled. thanks figjam
Straightveg wrote:from the burning blog entry here
"RENO, Nev. — Today the organizers of Burning Man filed a lawsuit against Pershing County, Nev., to stop the county’s attempt to impose a drastic increase in fees on the annual weeklong event, which is held on public land managed by the U.S. government. This action will not affect the 2012 event."
BatCountry wrote:Lovelock is the only town that Burners pass though that is located in Pershing County. I'm encouraging everyone I know to not spend money between Winnemucca and Fernley.
CapSmashy wrote:Shambala wrote:At this point in time, the local economies depend on the money that the Burning Man Festival generates. It appears that Pershing County is attempting to drive over the golden goose with a police cruiser. It might be time to move this whole event to someplace fresh and new. Maybe something with rolling hills, trees and maybe a river flowing through. I'm ready!![]()
Several problems here.
1. No big burns. Even if the area is not under wildfire conditions/burn bans, no "authority" figure will sign off on lighting multiple 100 foot tall structures on fire with big pyro displays in the middle of a forest or grassland area.
2. Ecological impact of 60k plus campers in an active, diverse wilderness ecosystem.
3. Critters. Snakes, bugs, furry things with teeth... The flood of raccoons alone going for trash would be horrific. Throw in some bears and it would get real exciting. Some e-tard would think the bear wants to be friends and try to give it a hug.
vargaso wrote:In my opinion, the Black Rock Desert is integral to Burning Man. Many of the features of the event originated organically in response to the playa's features. Easy (most years) biking is crucial. Just the concept of a literal blank slate is important. Burning Man could move, but the event would change dramatically, which is neither good nor bad, I suppose.
jerroc wrote:There might be limits set on nudity to confine it to a more nudist colony concept where it is set out of "public" view.
I could see where they would want to increase Police enforcement to enforce nudity or luied act laws.
Most likely people will have to cover the extreme gential area.
pink wrote:I'll have to look at a map and see exactly where Pershing vs Washoe is. Might not have to move very far


Eric wrote:pink wrote:I'll have to look at a map and see exactly where Pershing vs Washoe is. Might not have to move very far
They're right next to each-other. Fairly straight border line, Washoe on the California side. The catch is that the vast majority of the easily accessible Black Rock Playa is in Pershing (there is an arm in Humbolt county to the north, but it would be one hell of a drive across the playa to get there!).
offarock wrote:vargaso wrote:In my opinion, the Black Rock Desert is integral to Burning Man. Many of the features of the event originated organically in response to the playa's features. Easy (most years) biking is crucial. Just the concept of a literal blank slate is important. Burning Man could move, but the event would change dramatically, which is neither good nor bad, I suppose.
Sounds like Alvord desert in Oregon then?
MyDearFriend wrote:I can't believe I'm taking shit from a meat-cake-with-teeth. :lol:
clocksnmirrors wrote:jerroc wrote:There might be limits set on nudity to confine it to a more nudist colony concept where it is set out of "public" view.
I could see where they would want to increase Police enforcement to enforce nudity or luied act laws.
Most likely people will have to cover the extreme gential area.
this does not just disappoint me, it pisses me off
jerroc wrote:Please understand I do not care weather a person wants to wear clothes or not. It Really does not matter to me. I only stated I understand there are people who disagree with these ideas and if it is in there power they will try to change it. I prefer my clothes on so this enforcement will not effect me. I don't see making people wear clothes as a 1st amendment violation so I don't feel my rights are taken away. If other people feel differently I have no problem with that either.
clocksnmirrors wrote:jerroc wrote:Please understand I do not care weather a person wants to wear clothes or not. It Really does not matter to me. I only stated I understand there are people who disagree with these ideas and if it is in there power they will try to change it. I prefer my clothes on so this enforcement will not effect me. I don't see making people wear clothes as a 1st amendment violation so I don't feel my rights are taken away. If other people feel differently I have no problem with that either.
my feelings aren't directed at you. it's the situation that has me pissed.
this is my first burn. i'm a nudist so i was really looking forward to a no-hassle, clothes-free experience
shroom wrote:I think it will stay put. Burning man would not work in a place other than the desert in my opinion. There are regionals around the south that I'm not to crazy about going to because they are in the woods. Well hell I live in the woods! I want to see the desert.
steve.t.sullivan wrote:I got the sense from my first Burn that part of what brings out that special Burny something in people is the harsh environment.
Return to Politics & Philosophy
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest