Simon of the Playa wrote:wow, i've never witnessed somebody shooting his own foot on-line..

cpart wrote:
Why do fire performers get free tickets but DJs don't?
Isotopia wrote:
Why do fire performers get free tickets but DJs don't?
Um, because fire spinning involves some small degree of talent?
gyre wrote:Simon of the Playa wrote:wow, i've never witnessed somebody shooting his own foot on-line.
theres a first for everything i guess.
pass the popcorn, JS...
Everything is on video, Simon.
Can probably find that one too.
The answer is most people don't want djs to attend.
Box Burner wrote:I have given some thought to the fact that DJs have had a good deal to do with the existence of newly manufactured vinyl records. And that many of them say that they are making great music. I think that record companies could enhance and provide greater opportunity for DJs to make really great music by manufacturing records that are not prerecorded.
LegendZero wrote:*A man in an impeccably tailored white suit with red narrow tie, glossy black shoes and hair, and strides calmly and with purpose out of the ether. He places a black briefcase as black as night upon the table in front him and opens it to withdraw a paper which he reads aloud*
I am the Devils advocate, I was summoned here because a question was repeatedly dismissed without being addressed. Let us begin.
Breaking down *looks at paper* Mr. Cpart's question titled "Why do fire performers get free tickets but DJs don't?"
It seems that my client was clearly asking why fire art performance has a higher value to the event than musical art performance.
to answer this question we will create a framework that allows for logical debate. Namely the following
Both performers are roughly equal in skill; not the best in the world, but clearly above average such that you would enjoy their performance and be able to appreciate the skill.
The dj will be assumed to play music you like, perhaps not exclusively, but some, that way taste in music is not grounds for bias.
Client makes the assertion that Music, such as that played by a DJ is as valueable or more valuable than a fire art performance. As devils advocate I support this argument with my first piece of evidence that a DJ is more interactive of an art than fire performance since you can dance to it with others and more people can be in attendance of a single performance.
As interactivity is a well respected and de facto measure of art's value to the event we stipulate the DJ's are *looks at paper* Far "burnier" than a non-interactive dance that happens to use fire as a prop.
*The advocate places the paper in the open briefcase and awaits a response.*

stretch80 wrote:And, another subject that has had the crap beat out of it....
Zombie Thread. Die thread, die!!!


cpart wrote:Box Burner wrote:I have given some thought to the fact that DJs have had a good deal to do with the existence of newly manufactured vinyl records. And that many of them say that they are making great music. I think that record companies could enhance and provide greater opportunity for DJs to make really great music by manufacturing records that are not prerecorded.
BURN
theCryptofishist wrote:You might also want to say that many conclave performers have to make a choice between paying more now and not getting a conclave ticket, or not paying now and then not going because the conclave didn't make the cut...
I won't because I'm just in this thread for the snark.
Simon of the Playa wrote:well it certainly is a lot more fun, creative and positive than the shit you spew here every day...if nobody responds to trolls, are they interactive?
Return to 2012 Tickets Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests