Isotopia wrote:
dr.placebo wrote:can't sit still wrote:Dr, you're showing your ignorance.
And you, CSS, are manifesting your credulity.
Now that we have the requisite ad hominem attacks out of the way, would you care to explain how using water as fuel actually works?
dr.placebo wrote:...would you care to explain how using water as fuel actually works?
Canoe wrote:dr.placebo wrote:...would you care to explain how using water as fuel actually works?
Then there's the Pantone engines. Water|hydro-carbon mix, typically gas or alcohol, ratio in the range of 95:5. Pre-heated in a specific design counter-flow air-to-air heat-exchanger, using the exhaust gases immediately after the exhaust manifold. Engine is started on its regular fuel and once at standard operating temperature, air input is diverted to source through the water-fuel mixture creating vapor that is drawn through the heat exchanger before entering the intake manifold.
No one seems to know why they work. Popular theories:
1. the waste exhaust heat breaks down the hydro-carbon fuel vapor down into smaller hydro-carbons (within the heat-exchanger in the presence of the water vapor so it doesn't ignite), thereby the combustion of these smaller/simpler hydro-carbons yields more energy when ignited in the engine.
2. that it is, or is aided by, a portion of the water vapor breaking down into oxygen and hydrogen. Last I checked no one has been able to measure if there is or isn't hydrogen in the heat-exchanger fuel-vapor output.
Intriguing is that Pantone setups appear to work better when the center rod in the heat-exchanger has a high nickel content...
But, as the exhaust gas temperature drops when running in Pantone mode, that energy has to be going somewhere. This is a good sign as with energy there is no free lunch. So there is a credible aspect to a Pantone setup: recycling waste heat back into the engine through the water|fuel heated vapor "method".
From the example gas and diesel engines converted to work aspirated , it doesn't appear to work well (if it works at all) with gas engines with any kind of spark pre-ignition as that will ignite the mixture prematurely (a high school in France documented that well).
Appears to be an easy conversion for aspirated diesels. Very popular with tractors and generators, pretty much anywhere there's a long running constant load (easier to get the regular fuel vs. water|fuel mixtures balanced?). Also very easy to construct and install the heat-exchanger on a tractor's vertical stack.
After running for a time, some conversions require a short time running on regular fuel again before switching back to the water-fuel mixture, or increasing the regular fuel's idle setting while running in Pantone mode. Getting around this, successes reported with fuel injected engines: when running at operating temperature with the fuel injection continuing at idle speed fuel feeds (providing a continuous heat source?) at the fuel-vapour aspirated feed providing throttle.
One guy has shown photos of his engine converted to Pantone on his helicopter! (tail number carefully hidden)
Most popular in France and Quebec.
dr.placebo wrote:...would you care to explain how using water as fuel actually works?
dr.placebo wrote:would you care to explain how using water as fuel actually works?
BlackRockCityPimp wrote:dr.placebo wrote:would you care to explain how using water as fuel actually works?
I will not even credit your vitriol about Paul Pantone and the horrendous abuse he suffered as a result of corrupt politicians with a defense in his name since he was released and got international recognition for his work.
If you are so addicited to opposing hydrogen and its combustability try to lobby for more fracking. If you dont understand electrolysis and how hydrogen is produced with a lil baking soda and electricity and water than please stop calling yourself a Doctor. Chris Hackett a beloved burner has demonstrated the combustion of hydrogen via HHO on his TV show Stuck with Hackett. The Hindenburg demonstrated the combustion for fawkes sake
. You wouldnt by any chance be working for an oil company would you?
BlackRockCityPimp wrote:If you are so addicited to opposing hydrogen and its combustability try to lobby for more fracking. If you dont understand electrolysis and how hydrogen is produced with a lil baking soda and electricity and water than please stop calling yourself a Doctor.
dr.placebo wrote:BlackRockCityPimp wrote:If you are so addicited to opposing hydrogen and its combustability try to lobby for more fracking. If you dont understand electrolysis and how hydrogen is produced with a lil baking soda and electricity and water than please stop calling yourself a Doctor.
Hydrogen is a fuel, and water is not. Producing hydrogen from water requires energy.
Hydrogen is potentially a very good fuel, since it burns so cleanly. However, there are a lot of engineering problems to solve before we can use it to replace hydrocarbons.
I do not support continued use of fossil fuels (beyond certain niche uses).
As far as I can tell, Pantone is another crank. I could be wrong, but extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
BlackRockCityPimp wrote:dr.placebo wrote:BlackRockCityPimp wrote:If you are so addicited to opposing hydrogen and its combustability try to lobby for more fracking. If you dont understand electrolysis and how hydrogen is produced with a lil baking soda and electricity and water than please stop calling yourself a Doctor.
Hydrogen is a fuel, and water is not. Producing hydrogen from water requires energy.
Hydrogen is potentially a very good fuel, since it burns so cleanly. However, there are a lot of engineering problems to solve before we can use it to replace hydrocarbons.
I do not support continued use of fossil fuels (beyond certain niche uses).
As far as I can tell, Pantone is another crank. I could be wrong, but extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
Last I checked magnets and wires in motion generated electricity. I dont think we need to reinvent alternators or reverse wired electric motors from table saws and whatnot. Again electrolysis releases the hydrogen from the water in HHO. As far as Pantone tech goes I think youre just one of those earth is still flat people. When I Googled and Youtubed Pantone Engine I got different results than you claim to have gotten. Too bad you missed out on Greenman, I saw several HHO and GEET systems along with VegOil diesel and Gasifiers. I would mention hydrogen powered burners from an HHO cell being used to heat for a stirling Steam motor but since you dont believe in hydrogen production via electrolysis I will just consider you too smart for your own good.
Enjoy your shitty gas economy in what ever you drive while I get 65-68 mpg with HHO assist my gas 95 pickup from chevy. The real problem here is that the human race can no longer afford insanity such as yours anymore. We cannot allow the corporate greed to get in the way of sensible working solutions. There is plenty of water for fuel, we need to use it.
PS The Hydrogen geeks in Germany had their 30th anniversary / workshop this year. Also on youtube but in german language.
ygmir wrote:interesting........do you generate the H while driving, or use compressed/bottled for your truck?
gyre wrote:Gas engines are already limited by heat, and capable of more power with a leaner mixture.
How does H combat that?
Potential in higher combustion temperatures with evan's fluid, without destruction, seems possible.
gyre wrote:You know about N2O, right?
And it's issues?
It has been used for efficiency before.
Performance and mileage are two sides of the same coin.
Engines have detonation issues, but beyond that there is simply too much heat for the structure.
There is already far more energy in petrol than most engines can exploit.
To a certain extent, most engines use fuel for cooling.
Evan's potential is not fully explored and most info is proprietary, but many people use it now for racing, many just for corrosion protection in diesels.
My 408 uses a high pressure water pump to stave off boiling in the cylinder head.
Compression is very high.
Good engine tuning, but not too radical.
Out of date electronics, stock nineties ford computer with tweaked sensors.
25 mpg highway, anywhere from 50-100mph, 450/450 at 6000 feet.
So there's a lot you can do without exotic engines.
Better tuning and electronics make big improvements, with the accompanying heat risk.
Isotopia wrote:Certainly doesn't seem to have kept my across the street neighbor from staying home.
Taken two days ago.
Why does anyone feel compelled to pay for (and drive) one of these.
And yes, it does start with a 'B.'
"
dr.placebo wrote:...
I did a similar search for Pantone engine (sifting out a lot of Pantone color false hits) and got another load of weird stuff. The only plausible gain of efficiency is by using the exhaust heat, but it was beyond tedious to separate any wheat from the chaff, so I gave up. ...
My understanding of another posted claim that the water broke down into elements (H + O) and the energy came from recombination, again violating the 2nd law. Further, since water is not consumed, it is not fuel.
dr.placebo wrote:...In other words, my question stands: How can water be used as a fuel? Outside of fusion (no practical vehicular demonstration so far) or intensely radioactive water (unstable isotopes of elements) I know of nothing physically permitted. I will not give credit for non-fuel use of water (must extract energy and consume water), magic, alien technology, or any violations of the laws of thermodynamics.
motskyroonmatick wrote:With my purchase of a 2007 Prius I now get over 50 mpg and that's up from 19mpg.
motskyroonmatick wrote:I still have The Worlds Greatest Box Truck so I do still get atrocious milage at times.15mpg unladen and 10mpg at 18,000gvw.
motskyroonmatick wrote:Ha ha ha ha ha Yiggy!!!!!!!!!!! I totally did not catch that until now.
BTW I'm getting even better milage with the installation of LRR tires. Ha ha ha ha ha ha. It is a really fun car to drive. I already have a burning man sticker on it and I made it mine with a hand full of playa dust gathered from Golficus Carticus by throwing it on the hood emblem.
I still have The Worlds Greatest Box Truck so I do still get atrocious milage at times.15mpg unladen and 10mpg at 18,000gvw.
ygmir wrote:motskyroonmatick wrote:Ha ha ha ha ha Yiggy!!!!!!!!!!! I totally did not catch that until now.
BTW I'm getting even better milage with the installation of LRR tires. Ha ha ha ha ha ha. It is a really fun car to drive. I already have a burning man sticker on it and I made it mine with a hand full of playa dust gathered from Golficus Carticus by throwing it on the hood emblem.
I still have The Worlds Greatest Box Truck so I do still get atrocious milage at times.15mpg unladen and 10mpg at 18,000gvw.
you're talking to a man with a 40' crane mounted on a multi-fuel M35 which might get 5 mpg.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest