Eric wrote:BeachBum wrote:Next year, please make it harder to do the lottery signup, maybe requiring a written page on how you plan to do "radical self-survival" and what you have contributed to TTITD in terms of volunteering on or off playa, art, art cars, camp volunteering, ... That would cut the number of clueless lottery entries down dramatically and allow more of our friends to make it to the playa.
It takes the low-income team what, a couple months?, to get through the 4,000 or so written applications to decide who gets one. Are you willing to wait 6 or 7 months for Ticketing to read through 60 or 70 thousand applications before you find out if you get a ticket? Yeah, didn't think so.
Besides, everybody, even you, was a virgin once and your plan cuts them out completely so your friends can come back- personally that sounds like a plan for stagnation to me.
Hell, just making people put down $100 refundable deposit would cut out a lot of "maybe"'s. No need to make people prove they fit some ideological Burner Master Race category.
trilobyte wrote:@jkisha - nothing about that article has me up in arms in particular, it's another perfect example of what they do (parrot other peoples' blogs or news articles without really adding anything to the story.

theCryptofishist wrote:I admit that it's not a lot of women who marry a closeted man, urge him into running for Senator as a republican, lose the race, let him out of the closet, get a divorce, reinvent herself as a leftist, and publish 4 or more books with what appear to me much plagerisation. And then put up a website.
To me, she comes across as someone who wants to be a mover and a shaker. And as someone who's oddly cluless. I don't read the HuffPo enough to really have an opinion on it, but Arianna ... um...
Wanna ride bikes?

Eric wrote:BeachBum wrote:Next year, please make it harder to do the lottery signup, maybe requiring a written page on how you plan to do "radical self-survival" and what you have contributed to TTITD in terms of volunteering on or off playa, art, art cars, camp volunteering, ... That would cut the number of clueless lottery entries down dramatically and allow more of our friends to make it to the playa.
It takes the low-income team what, a couple months?, to get through the 4,000 or so written applications to decide who gets one. Are you willing to wait 6 or 7 months for Ticketing to read through 60 or 70 thousand applications before you find out if you get a ticket? Yeah, didn't think so.
Besides, everybody, even you, was a virgin once and your plan cuts them out completely so your friends can come back- personally that sounds like a plan for stagnation to me.
Hell, just making people put down $100 refundable deposit would cut out a lot of "maybe"'s. No need to make people prove they fit some ideological Burner Master Race category.
BeachBum wrote: If you think that there was outrage this year over the ticketing fiasco, wait till next year to see real outrage if so many people who self-identify with TTITD and contribute are excluded again.
theCryptofishist wrote:As the slow motion collapse of facebook is showing us, it is a pretty savvy person who manages to actually make money on a web-based business.


BeachBum wrote:But if no changes are made for next year, there are going to be well over 150K lottery entrants for 50K spots.
theCryptofishist wrote:BeachBum wrote:But if no changes are made for next year, there are going to be well over 150K lottery entrants for 50K spots.
Where are you getting this information?
And, um, how much more are you willing to pay in order for the llc to hire enough people to read 150,000 thousand pages?
And isn't it futile to have an essay question because the next service of plug and play will be essay for ticket hire?
BeachBum wrote:The org said that there were 120K ticket applications for this year.

5280MeV wrote:The other issue with applications is that the people who hire people to wipe their asses for them will also likely pay to have applications written.
This is likely to be an all inclusive package, you get your ass wiped (triple-ply or moist towel - the neck of a goose is extra), and they customize an application for you.
I know that many people feel that there are too many rules already, but what if we required people to give their ass-wiper a week off in the spirit of radical self-reliance?
Think of how much they will learn about themselves as they do this on their own!
BeachBum wrote:Doing the tickets in a non-fiasco manner would reduce the cost to the organization in terms of time spent and pain endured from what occurred this year.
Eric wrote:Fishy- the Burning Blog said something along the lines of the demand being 3 times greater than the number of tickets, 40,000 tickets were in the lottery so roughly 120,000 were requested.


Eric wrote:BeachBum wrote:Doing the tickets in a non-fiasco manner would reduce the cost to the organization in terms of time spent and pain endured from what occurred this year.
While I agree that they need changes for next year, the idea of a "non-fiasco" is impossible as long as more people want to attend than the BLM will allow on the playa. It's really as simple as demand being much higher than supply and we've reached a point where there will be people who can't attend, regardless of how much they want to. As long as those people exist any "solution" will be considered a fiasco.
As for having a computer check for keywords on a written entry: Burners are a smart bunch, it would be just as easy to make a program to ensure those keywords were in your application. There are always loopholes, good people will always get left out in the crush. I don't like it, I'm just realistic enough to view the bigger picture of where the Events at right now.
Don't think that just because I don't agree with your specific ideas that it means that you're not getting a "reasonable conversation"; you're just not getting unquestioning agreement. I personally think your idea depends on too many impossible & expensive variables (everyone being honest, a new computer program to scan the documents, no false documents... ) to be effective, and it doesn't deal with the demand being greater than the number of tickets at all.
BeachBum wrote:don't chalk it up to demand being much higher than supply, and give up on ticket sales next year not being a fiasco without trying to get the tickets to the people who want them the most.
From Econ 101,
Bob wrote:Another way to put it:
The org's media dept's incessant marketing exceeded the community's capacity for fulfillment.
<drink>

Return to 2011 Art & Performance
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests