



Foxfur wrote:Gang, Mish. Mish, gang.
Ain't she sweet?
remi wrote:Foxfur wrote:Gang, Mish. Mish, gang.
Ain't she sweet?
Very much so! I think this years theme supports playing laybia tag.

jkisha wrote:I don't like the theme either. What is the theme, by the way?
theCryptofishist wrote:jkisha wrote:I don't like the theme either. What is the theme, by the way?
Pound it.

theCryptofishist wrote:jkisha wrote:I don't like the theme either. What is the theme, by the way?
Pound it.


Nipple wrote:So, I keep hearing about the theme, but I haven't heard it.
Can I get this years theme in an MP3 from somewhere?
Eric wrote:Fine, it's "1.0", but you try finding a song called "Fertility 2.0"!
Eric wrote:Nipple wrote:junglesmacks wrote:Why would this be "2.0" then if it wasn't used before?
I'm going to webapp friend tag-cloud like your Fertility, and share podcasting mashups with standards compliant p2p crowdsourcing.
I'm with Nipple.
Larry's been in SF too long and thinks 2.0 sounds cool.
Like I said- I can't find anything official (yet) that says that Fertility was the theme in '97 or any other year. Doesn't mean it wasn't, but as far as I've found it certainly isn't looking like it was. I may be eating my words later, but at least they're low calorie.
chiefdanfox wrote:
I'm with Nipple.
Larry's been in SF too long and thinks 2.0 sounds cool.
Like I said- I can't find anything official (yet) that says that Fertility was the theme in '97 or any other year. Doesn't mean it wasn't, but as far as I've found it certainly isn't looking like it was. I may be eating my words later, but at least they're low calorie.
I am wondering if he borrowed the idea from a group of scientists at UCB (Cal). Earlier this year they proposed that we humans embark on creating Carbon 2.0, which is the idea that we need to create a second carbon cycle to close the loop on carbon emissions (that is, continue burning carbon, but capture and reuse the emissions...um, that didn't really come out right). 2.0 is dog whistle for the redesigning or rethinking an existing paradigm.
Savannah wrote:It sounds freaky & wrong, so you need to do it.
junglesmacks wrote:Although.. in the meantime, we've clarified that it was indeed the theme in 1997. So, yeah.. this is a recycled theme.
Eric wrote:junglesmacks wrote:Although.. in the meantime, we've clarified that it was indeed the theme in 1997. So, yeah.. this is a recycled theme.
I've decided to recycle my annual "ignoring of the theme"
Savannah wrote:It sounds freaky & wrong, so you need to do it.
junglesmacks wrote:Eric wrote:junglesmacks wrote:Although.. in the meantime, we've clarified that it was indeed the theme in 1997. So, yeah.. this is a recycled theme.
I've decided to recycle my annual "ignoring of the theme"
I'm with you. I feel like the only thing the theme influences anymore is the eplaya discussion fodder and some minor talking amongst y'selves..
Ugly Dougly wrote:As it turns out, the theme both sucks and blows, effectively canceling itself out.
So, what's your theme?
I favor a gambling theme.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests