watsonic wrote:Hi,
A link to this was sent out over the JRS recently: http://www.youtube.com/user/FlexYourRights
My question is does all of this apply to BLM officers detaining you on BLM land?
What if one is asked by a BLM officer to have their bag searched when walking around playa?
What rights do you have on federal land?
w
ZaphodBurner wrote:
The difference between buying a ticket from a scalper and prostituting yourself for one is, if you suck dick for a ticket and brag about it, burners will still respect you.
JStep wrote:You *always* retain all of your constitutional rights unless you voluntarily waive them.
MyDearFriend wrote:I can't believe I'm taking shit from a meat-cake-with-teeth. :lol:
MyDearFriend wrote:I can't believe I'm taking shit from a meat-cake-with-teeth. :lol:
A Jester wrote:If a BLM officer asked to search my bag, I'd politely ask them what would happen if I refused.
A Jester wrote:Then, I'd head over to the nearest Ranger station and fill out a Law Enforcement Feedback Form.
watsonic wrote:The officer stopped him going 10 in a 5 (for real!) and asked if there was anything in the car he should know about. He told the guy if he searched his car and found any illegal substances he would be kicked out of the event for the duration of the event. Not wanting to go all the way home after driving all the way out and preparing for weeks, the guy gave the cop a dime bag of weed that was in the center compartment of the vehicle. He was handed a $500 ticket and allowed on his way.
Are these stations in consistent locations every year? Where?
watsonic wrote:This is a hard situation. If you say "what if I refuse?" and they say "if I find anything I will eject you from this event", its hard to know whether they WILL search you and then do that or not. Any advice on this front?
MyDearFriend wrote:I can't believe I'm taking shit from a meat-cake-with-teeth. :lol:
Eric wrote:Never speak to the police, never answer their questions. Watch the video links BBadger posted above, see the pdf link above as well. Your friend confessed to a crime when he didn't have to (don't forget Nevada has incredibly strong anti-drug laws). He could have gone to jail instead of the event.
BBadger wrote:
Why? Because nothing you say can, or ever will be used to help your case. Furthermore, the very fact that the stories your friends and you have will be different even on minor details will incriminate you. In fact, a cop with a bad memory could twist your story against you if you say anything. The cop in the second part of the video says this explicitly.
So everybody shut the fuck up. Silence can't contradict silence.
Do not trust any promises made by the cops. Do not respond to their questions. Do not believe that one is your friends. The more you say, the more they'll worm more out of you.
watsonic wrote:To be fair, this could have ended much worse. BLM could have searched the car because they smelled something, writing the ticket, possibly ejecting my friend from the event and sending him to jail. How is *that* for a year at BMan?? From one point of view he got a deal. What I don't know much about is what constitutes reasonable suspicion.
In the FYR videos in the "right way" takes, the cops ask the kids to step out of the vehicle (which they did to my friend too) and they comply. Ok so I assume one has to comply with a request to "step out of the vehicle".
At that point any faint smells could possibly be detected. If a faint smell is detected (and how am I to guess how sensitive a LEO's nose is?) the LEO has reasonable suspicion. Or maybe he doesn't even need that. Maybe he thinks you look cracked out. Maybe he thinks you're talking strangely. What is reasonable suspicion?
MyDearFriend wrote:I can't believe I'm taking shit from a meat-cake-with-teeth. :lol:
BBadger wrote:Unless a cloud of pot smoke bellowed out of the window when you rolled it down, the officer will have a hard time justifying a search, especially if you're being polite and giving no reasonable reason to have your belonging searched.
BBadger wrote:What is reasonable suspicion?
IT DOESN'T MATTER. If they're suspicious, they're suspicious. What does that change? Nothing.
watsonic wrote:But who is there to justify the search to? Lets suppose someone does have something in the car and the cop decides there is reasonable suspicion and finds something. Do you really think it would hold up in court to say "but he didn't have reasonable suspicion!" It's not like the cop has to use some device to collect data and prove it. He just says "yep i smelled it and i found it." Case closed.
...
Unless I'm mistaken, this matters very much and changes everything. RS allows an officer to defy your wish for him not to search, right? If there is "reasonable suspicion" there will be a search whether you consent or not and the officer may later cite this RS as cause to search (at which point we're left with the situation above). Please correct me if this is wrong, but I've always understood this to be the case.
MyDearFriend wrote:I can't believe I'm taking shit from a meat-cake-with-teeth. :lol:
BBadger wrote:I'm not sure what you're really getting at here, or what you're trying to argue for. Are you saying that it is somehow better or acceptable to voluntarily waive your rights because of some preconceived inevitability? That somehow waiving your rights will result in a more lenient punishment (hint: that's what torturing interrogators promise), or reduce the level of suspicion? Nothing is further from the truth. There is no acceptable reason, whatsoever, for waiving your rights.
watsonic wrote:
But inevitably someone I care about will find themselves in a situation where there *is* RS. And then what?
Shambala wrote:
I have already heard from friends on their way that burner looking vehicles are being eyed very carefully. This event has become a cash cow for these law enforcement agencies. The large fines that are given, make these guys heroes within their departments. Try not to get stopped.
BBadger wrote: There is no acceptable reason, whatsoever, for waiving your rights.
Savannah wrote:It sounds freaky & wrong, so you need to do it.
Savannah wrote:It sounds freaky & wrong, so you need to do it.
junglesmacks wrote:You know.. this is kinda of unrelated but not.
Say I get pulled over and I've had a few drinks.. like more in general life. Cop walks up to the window and asks.. "So, you been drinking?"
If I say no, then I've just provided false information yet I've admitted nothing and not given probable cause as long as I'm acting sober.
If I say yes, then I've admitted guilt yet told the truth.
If I say nothing, then it seems that I'm admitting guilt or pushing him to progress.
How to handle?
Savannah wrote:It sounds freaky & wrong, so you need to do it.
junglesmacks wrote:
I'm sure that most of us here have been stopped by an LEO while operating something mechanical and intoxicated at the same time, and both parties knew the truth and yet both walked away from the situation. .
ZaphodBurner wrote:
The difference between buying a ticket from a scalper and prostituting yourself for one is, if you suck dick for a ticket and brag about it, burners will still respect you.
junglesmacks wrote:If I say nothing, then it seems that I'm admitting guilt or pushing him to progress.
MyDearFriend wrote:I can't believe I'm taking shit from a meat-cake-with-teeth. :lol:
Return to Q & A Tips and Tricks
Users browsing this forum: hippyDdoc and 0 guests