Bob wrote:Don't pick up Rutger Hauer.
AntiM wrote:Plenty to see, lots of scenic overlooks.
Eastbound time lapse:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6m4Xhd0qGVk
Sail Man wrote:I as well plan to change my routing this year, but will do it on the way back as we have an extra week off after the burn, and the route you suggested is what we plan on using for the most part. Your trip on 50 last year inspired me to check it out this year. We plan on camping at either Great Basin or Arches for a couple nights, not sure which one yet. But we will look at the timeline when we hit Denver, and either take 76 back up to 80, or continue on 70 and hang a left at 69![]()
![]()
Though I am disappointed that some jackass(es) cut down the shoe tree
robotland wrote:Sail Man wrote:I as well plan to change my routing this year, but will do it on the way back as we have an extra week off after the burn, and the route you suggested is what we plan on using for the most part. Your trip on 50 last year inspired me to check it out this year. We plan on camping at either Great Basin or Arches for a couple nights, not sure which one yet. But we will look at the timeline when we hit Denver, and either take 76 back up to 80, or continue on 70 and hang a left at 69![]()
![]()
Though I am disappointed that some jackass(es) cut down the shoe tree
Whaaaa? Dang! Maybe I'll have to plant a Sock Seedling in its place as memorial....
illy dilly wrote:Hey Robot land, you've driven I70 from Denver to Utah before?
I agree, I70 is way prettier than I80, thats for sure!
For those of us living in Denver, the extra cost and time makes I70 not worth it. But we can also shoot over to Grand Junction or Moab anytime we feel like.
ygmir wrote:There's another shoe tree, along hwy 50 in Utah, west of "Delta" I think.
I stopped and took pics on my trip to CO a few weeks ago.
robotland wrote:http://www.roadsideamerica.com/blog/memorial-shoe-tree/
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
Rats. It WAS that one. Maybe there's a new one closer to Delta now!
Fabricator wrote:Great post. Coming from northern Ohio and have been wrestling with which route to take. I80 vs I70. I80 is the shortest route
Pretty much just trying to avoid the toll roads on I80 from Ohio to west of Chicago.Seemed about 180 miles more to take I70 (get down to it, and then back up to I80 before Nevada) But I HATE the Ohio turnpike, Indiana Toll Road, and all the ridiculous tolls getting by Chicago in Illinois.
Spent way too much time yesterday on the web trying to get an accurate count of what tolls will be driving I80. What I save in tolls I think I've figured I pay out again in the added fuel in my 15mpg van.
I70 it is... I think... I'll change my mind again tomorrow.
Anyone else experienced in the drive that can also weigh in regarding the grades/hills I might encounter in traveling I70 vs I80? Van will be heavy. Afraid I might find out I'll be pulling more like 10-12mpg that could add hundreds in my costs.
Sincerely,
Compulsively mathematical driver.
robotland wrote:Tell me more about this "extra cost and time"- The route I plotted is very close to the '80 route by length, but I suspect there's more up-and-down-and-around in the Rockies on '70. Is that where the time and money go?
Users browsing this forum: pink and 1 guest