gyre wrote:I don't know about everyone else on here, but I am comfortable in some very different social circles.
It keeps life interesting.

Kiro wrote:An FAQ section seems an obvious and easy fix for most of the new member questions. It could/should be a snark-free zone so people can find answers easily, with only on-topic replies allowed. With no more questions being repeatedly asked, there would be no problem with snarky fuckheads upsetting new members.
The phpBB settings can be changed so that BBCode is activated on accounts by default. People's quotes and images will work as intended from the start, like every other forum on the internet.
With those two changes, it would be easier and friendlier for new members to join in, old timers would be relaxing with people who won't ask irritating questions, and the air of unpleasantness will drift away.
And now, commence snark.
Kiro wrote:An FAQ section seems an obvious and easy fix for most of the new member questions. It could/should be a snark-free zone so people can find answers easily, with only on-topic replies allowed. With no more questions being repeatedly asked, there would be no problem with snarky fuckheads upsetting new members.
The phpBB settings can be changed so that BBCode is activated on accounts by default. People's quotes and images will work as intended from the start, like every other forum on the internet.
With those two changes, it would be easier and friendlier for new members to join in, old timers would be relaxing with people who won't ask irritating questions, and the air of unpleasantness will drift away.
And now, commence snark.
Fire_Moose wrote:YER ALL CYBER BULLIES!!
/runs off crying.
theCryptofishist wrote:Hormones.
AntiM wrote:Kiro wrote:An FAQ section seems an obvious and easy fix for most of the new member questions. It could/should be a snark-free zone so people can find answers easily, with only on-topic replies allowed. With no more questions being repeatedly asked, there would be no problem with snarky fuckheads upsetting new members.
The phpBB settings can be changed so that BBCode is activated on accounts by default. People's quotes and images will work as intended from the start, like every other forum on the internet.
With those two changes, it would be easier and friendlier for new members to join in, old timers would be relaxing with people who won't ask irritating questions, and the air of unpleasantness will drift away.
And now, commence snark.
The survival guide and the recommended reading are supposed to cover the FAQs.
The BBCode thing has been pointed out toTBTB. Changes are in the air, one supposes.
mudpuppy000 wrote:AntiM wrote:Kiro wrote:An FAQ section seems an obvious and easy fix for most of the new member questions. It could/should be a snark-free zone so people can find answers easily, with only on-topic replies allowed. With no more questions being repeatedly asked, there would be no problem with snarky fuckheads upsetting new members.
The phpBB settings can be changed so that BBCode is activated on accounts by default. People's quotes and images will work as intended from the start, like every other forum on the internet.
With those two changes, it would be easier and friendlier for new members to join in, old timers would be relaxing with people who won't ask irritating questions, and the air of unpleasantness will drift away.
And now, commence snark.
The survival guide and the recommended reading are supposed to cover the FAQs.
The BBCode thing has been pointed out toTBTB. Changes are in the air, one supposes.
I wonder if a Wiki might be more useful than trying to create something in this phpBB. It's hard to follow a long thread of posts with the inevitable thread drift.

jkisha wrote:Couldn't a Wiki get just a snarked up and drifted as a BBS Thread?
JK
Artemis wrote:jkisha wrote:Couldn't a Wiki get just a snarked up and drifted as a BBS Thread?
JK
But isn't that the beauty of a wiki? Folks could go in and edit away the snark and drift, no?
On another front, I saw something from cryptofishist about us scaring away Victoria. I originally read that as Virginia and was worried that maybe someone said something about Santa Claus. But who's Victoria and when did we scare her off?

lucky420 wrote:are you perhaps thinking of Victorian?
LoveLight wrote:BUt - if I ask you how much water do I need, please feel free to do more than snark...

tamarakay wrote:Snarkiness would not scare me off from here, but snarkiness has kept me from asking a few questions.
maryanimal wrote:In honor of the threads subject matter, I'm a newbie birgin in here and to the Burning Man family. I've been treated with kindess, snarkiness empathy, and have been schooled properly about Burning Man and had maaaaannnnny of my questions answered by a gaggle of experienced and new burners alike. And I love you and thank you all!
I must add that sometimes it's the burners outside of Burning Man that have questionable behavior and intentions. And that's all I'll say about that.
My upcoming experiece at Burning Man next year hasn't been sullied. I am so looking forward to meeting as many of you as I can! I need a tour guide...anyone available?
Elorrum wrote:ah, some who flamed out and then you wonder what happened.
guess it happens.
Did anyone meet Winebuff?
Users browsing this forum: Winkanmocker and 2 guests