by ubu » Thu Sep 04, 2003 3:23 pm
fair enough precip. You've got it exactly right. I'm not whining.
I was, at first curious, about the relative decriminalization of posession of schedule 1 controlled substances on federal lands, but I've researched it and that seems to be the standard across all federally patrolled property.
i also see that the termination language on the tickets is a part of the standard petty offense protocol used on federal lands as well. this can include camping in the wrong place on blm land, riding outside the perimeter at bm, collecting artifacts where designated improper, speeding, etc.
It is still up to the discretion of the commanding LEO just what kind of tack the officers take and to what degree they root around in campsites, how far they push the illegal searching, to what degree they issue warnings or give tickets, etc.
These rangers were extremely clever, or the senior officer was, in that even though he pushed the line, he was polite as he bent the procedural rules. They are clearly trained and nothing they are doing is without the command and consent of their senior officers. Of that I'm sure.
They know what they are doing, and the local federal magistrate judge would most likely side with the officers if one bothered to take one of these petty 250 fines to court. You'd probably be out much more than 250 including lawyer fees, if you bothered to contest, hence very little complaint and very little contest. a perfect game. the officers said as much to me when i talked with them. they out and out called it a game.
what was not clear in the survival guide was that you do not indeed have the right to expect even reasonable privacy at burning man; perhaps most do, but one must beware of surveillance and invasion of privacy. I think that something to that effect should be added to the guide in the future. it probably will not, because nothing too provocative ever makes into the survival guide.
Caveat Lector.