Risky wrote:I think the rules change when it come to blow jobs.
I'm pretty sure it's anytime anyplace.
It could BE lunch.
Karlene wrote:I can't stop smiling, I'm smiling like an idiot all the time. I realize that this will never come to anything permanent, A couple of factors are in the way, but for now, I'm jumping in head first and come what may.....
Elorrum wrote:Back to the bucket however. I don't get it. How come this isn't embarassing, or humiliating for the individual shitting in public? Was the fear of the porta pottie so strong, or the need for privacy so weak? Yes, Virginia, there really are different kinds of people aren't there? Fascinating. Combined with the cell phone, was this performance?
Elorrum wrote:"I find it interesting that bodily functions of elimination are so taboo. I guess there is the survival factor of surviving better if you don't come in to contact with others bodily waste....Did people who naturally avoided even seeing other people eliminate survive so much better have it evolve in to people naturally being disgusted by others bodily functions? I don't know. For something we do so much it sure is a silenced subject."
Yeah, Motskyroonmatick, good points. Natural selection for a trait I think requires that trait to allow an individual to survive to procreate with greater success than one who does not possess the trait. Shame I think is a much much much more recent phenomenon, perhaps more of a subject for cultural evolution than biological. Most bodily functions have a taboo associated with them when there are excreted materials involved, yes? Why? I don't think hygiene accounts totally for that. It's been too long since I took anthropology... I bet Margaret Meade had an answer for you. probably based in religion, male female social politics... and then hygiene, how recent is that a development? ... people who shit in buckets didn't get as sick as those who shit in their caves?
Karlene wrote:Here's a good one. This guy and girl came through our camp, nobody liked them, they were obnoxious. Anyway, they must have picked up the vibe because they got up to leave and the next thing we know she's giving him a blow job, right by our table while we were all having lunch. To each his own, but not during lunch....right?
Elorrum wrote:"I find it interesting that bodily functions of elimination are so taboo. I guess there is the survival factor of surviving better if you don't come in to contact with others bodily waste....Did people who naturally avoided even seeing other people eliminate survive so much better have it evolve in to people naturally being disgusted by others bodily functions? I don't know. For something we do so much it sure is a silenced subject."
Yeah, Motskyroonmatick, good points. Natural selection for a trait I think requires that trait to allow an individual to survive to procreate with greater success than one who does not possess the trait. Shame I think is a much much much more recent phenomenon, perhaps more of a subject for cultural evolution than biological. Most bodily functions have a taboo associated with them when there are excreted materials involved, yes? Why? I don't think hygiene accounts totally for that. It's been too long since I took anthropology... I bet Margaret Meade had an answer for you. probably based in religion, male female social politics... and then hygiene, how recent is that a development? ... people who shit in buckets didn't get as sick as those who shit in their caves?