EspressoDude wrote:Ff: you may get a lot of takers if you adjust the shape of the red cap to something phallic that you can roll comdoms onto...====> ~ ~
Isn't it already phallic?
EspressoDude wrote:Ff: you may get a lot of takers if you adjust the shape of the red cap to something phallic that you can roll comdoms onto...====> ~ ~
Dr Jet Sinister wrote:EspressoDude wrote:Ff: you may get a lot of takers if you adjust the shape of the red cap to something phallic that you can roll comdoms onto...====> ~ ~
Isn't it already phallic?


Foxfur wrote:Dr Jet Sinister wrote:EspressoDude wrote:Ff: you may get a lot of takers if you adjust the shape of the red cap to something phallic that you can roll comdoms onto...====> ~ ~
Isn't it already phallic?
The phrase "Gaping Sigmoidoscopy" scares the customers, every time... :shock:
shimmentakezo wrote:I must say, all this knowledge of uranium and RADS has got my gears a churnin'. I'm from way out east in kentucky where most people die from tobacco and booze, not any kind of radiation. As far as I am aware.
I'd be more worried and inclined to tell everyone how evil flouride is. Talk about a totally useless, suspicious chemical they put in the tap almost everywhere. And there have been smaller communities around the states who have demanded it to be removed so you know it can't be a totally moot point to try and not consume the stuff. Very awkward interviews are available online with reps. who control the usage of this chemical, mainly the ADA. And it is so freaking bizzare to see pro ADA and anti ADA sites (pro flouride/anti flouride). They act so suspicious they basically give themselves away despite the words that come out of their mouth.
I mean realistically I guess if you've been drinking it your entire life it won't make too much difference in the long run. It seems to depend on inner strength and how one consumes the right things that are proven to be anti-carcinogenic and so on.
I like to be healthy! It runs through my blood, but guess what? We all die and our bodies return to the source after awhile. So isn't it better to just have fun or at least minimize paranoia/negative thoughts?
Roberto Dobbisano wrote:+ U-235
jkisha wrote:Additionally, the government is issuing permits for the event, and if it were that dangerous, I wouldn't think they would issue an event permit for 60,000 people. It could open them up to a huge lawsuit, I would think.
JK
ygmir wrote:Roberto Dobbisano wrote:+ U-235
well, yes. I've lost 15 lbs. so far...........thanks for noticing.
Return to Experiences at Burning Man
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests