
Drawingablank wrote:Again applying logic, if only 30% of veterans got tickets it seems absurd to think that first timers got 70% of them when statistically they should have the same approximately 30% success rate. So if 30% of vets got tickets and 30% of first timers got tickets, who got the rest of the tickets?
trilobyte wrote:Info on numbers of registrations or total tickets requested has not (and probably will not) be published.
What if 70K people wanted to go?
Ugly Dougly wrote:Was prior attendance a factor in awarding tickets or are we just speculating?
Ugly Dougly wrote:Was prior attendance a factor in awarding tickets or are we just speculating?
How will this affect the community you have already built?
How will it change the dynamics of the unique do-ocracy culture of the Playa?
What is your vision of the next few years?
“
Token wrote:So 120000 wanted to go, 48000 first timers and 72000 previous attendees.
Getting rid of all the newbs would not have solved the problem.
Token wrote:OK, I get that it's hard to detach from the technical details so lets update the premise.
It was 3:1 oversubscribed and 40% first timers.
So 120000 wanted to go, 48000 first timers and 72000 previous attendees.
Getting rid of all the newbs would not have solved the problem.
Banning all the ravers and hippies? Maybe
So, back to the meat and potatoes; in a place that has a strong tendency to the 80:20 rule, where 20% do the incredible and create the art/camps/entertainment/jackassery, while 80% interact and enjoy...How will this affect the community you have already built?
How will it change the dynamics of the unique do-ocracy culture of the Playa?
What is your vision of the next few years?
“
trilobyte wrote:You don't have to believe it for it to be true.
...................................................knowmad wrote:I have 70,000 people trying to get in my pants. Some times all at the same time. I could raise the price, I could be more chosey. But in the end Im the bitch who won't fuck you and the gold-digging-whore who just wants more. And we are eveywhere!
wraith wrote:trilobyte wrote:You don't have to believe it for it to be true.
Nah, but when we're all pulling guesses out of our asses, being statistically plausible is better.
Return to Politics & Philosophy
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests