bradtem wrote:5 minutes per car was not an estimate of what it costs us today. I don't know if a good histogram exists, but often it's hours per person of wait, sometimes it's a breeze-through. The problem is not as trivial as you make it out to be. By my measurement over the years, it's been 10-12 hours each time between leaving the Bay Area and getting to camp. Many factors contribute to that, not just gate wait, but the drive from blacktop to camp is one of the largest expanding factors. Why this matters is that the daylight is not much more than 12 hours long at that time of year, so almost any departure means arrival in camp after sunset. This in turn causes many to spend the night in Reno before. Not that I have anything against Reno but this is a large added factor.
The suggestion of computerized placement is serious, though it would be a fair bit of work. While I have always been in a placed camp (except in 1998) I find little to love about the current system for unplaced camps which is:
a) Early arrivals try to stake out places for others. Some are removed, some are not.
b) People who ignored the firm admonitions in all communications about not coming to the gate before midnight get let in many hours early, and get first crack at claiming space
c) People who did time to arrive at midnight find a long line, and make it to the playa even later to find what's left.
d) Either way most arrive at night, a lousy time to be scurrying around finding space, talking to potential neighbours and setting up camp. Some are delayed enough that the sun rises before they get in, but they are dead tired.
What's to love about that system? Why would you dislike a system where there is a fair and clear allocation (as much as the landgrab as you like) and people arrive at good times to set up, and also balanced over the day (particularly if you give them a means to judge when the wait will be shorter.)
We may want stowaways caught, but we don't want to wait hours to make that happen. Particularly when the reality of the new "no sales at the gate, really, we mean it this time" approach meant that there were extremely few stowaways. As long as those who knowingly carry stowaways have to turn around and go home, I predict there will be very little in the way of sneaking in that can be caught.
To reduce gate delays, key things you can do include:
1) Spread out the peaks
2) Find special rewards for volunteers so you have more of them
3) Only random heavy searches when line is >30min (apparently already done)
4) Express lanes for dusty veterans who have sent in a contract agreement regarding all playa contraband. And possibly for carpools. This doesn't just get them in faster, it speeds up everybody because the time saved on not checking them as much means more resources to apply to virgins. (Still get random checks, and failure on random check means never getting the express line again, in addition to other penalties.)
In spite of what you might think, the "trust most people, and trust bonded people almost entirely" is the approach used at gates where much more serious stuff goes on than at Burning Man. Most cargo goes in and out of countries un-searched because it goes by bonded carriers who know they will lose their bond and their business if they cheat. And people go via nexus cards. That's how the people who worry about terrorists, illegal immigrants and drugs do it -- even when for them it's a much bigger risk and a less wise strategy.
If you want to keep out "riff-raff and douchebags", however you plan to identify such people, good luck, but this is not the method. (BTW, some of the people who have been among the biggest contributors to the community look just like riff-raff and douchebags.)
Car passes are nothing new either. Drive-in movies use them, in spite of strong normal demands from movie studios to count how many go in.
MyDearFriend wrote:I can't believe I'm taking shit from a meat-cake-with-teeth. :lol:
You're at Burning Man dude

bradtem wrote:As I said, Burning Man walks this line between being a community and a corporate event. Even if I were to concede your anti-radical-inclusion argument that people like being searched and find the wait worthwhile because it keeps out the "riff-raff" those people would still be quite happy if the process were faster and still kept out these unwanted riff-raff.
I do think virgins and veterans are different. Virgins are trying out Burning Man, and know what it's like only through descriptions. Veterans have made a commitment to it, have joined it as a community, and are being welcomed back home. Veterans will care more about the community, and feel they have more to lose if they are turned back at the gate, lose veteran privileges or are "banned-for-life." (Of course a ban would not stop you from getting in but it would push you to being a spectator which for veterans is a punishment.)
Point is, with the entire-car-turned-away rule the word I've gotten from Gate&Perimeter folks is that the stowaway problem is largely solved. As long as random checks exist (for veterans and virgins) it seems likely there will be insignificant stowing away -- and close to zero by veterans with more to lose. That leaves things like guns, fireworks and moopy things, and they don't really do a search for those, more a check and reminder, since you would not find them if somebody was actively trying to sneak them in.
There is, of course, another huge advantage to advanced placement other than the ones I have cited, which is knowing in advance what your address will be. This makes it easy for your friends and campmates to find your camp, lets you put events in the WWW that have your address, lets you plan a camp map if you wish to. Today more and more camps that are quite organized are not getting placed because they are just an organized camp, not a theme camp. It's been one of their most bitter complaints that they don't get an address in advance.
One hears this a lot these days as an excuse for the status quo. One of the most distinctive things about Burning Man is its ephemeral nature. Things not only can change, they are supposed to change. "That's the way we do things around here" is not the answer.
MyDearFriend wrote:I can't believe I'm taking shit from a meat-cake-with-teeth. :lol:
stretch80 wrote:bradtem,
The only reason that the so-called "Expert" lines work at airports is due to the fact that the people entering those lines actually make an effort to reduce their wait. (ie have their shit together)
Everyone in the line to BRC could be in a Expert line if they wanted to be.
Rice
bradtem wrote:Not sure what you're saying. Actually, most people were surprised at reports the Expert line works, with no enforcement. However, Burning Man knows who its veterans are. Almost all of them buy tickets directly from BMOrg by mail to get in on the early price tiers. (There is much speculation about how that will work this year with fear of a sell-out.) People who register art and mutant vehicles and camps all fill out forms indicating how many years they have come. Sure, there are some who buy other ways but my understanding is that this is a minority.
Of course some veterans like Paul Addis will be bad actors. No system would stop somebody like Addis from coming in. If you think that's a dealbreaker then I haven't been clear about how such systems work. They are not intended to be perfect at all or even close to perfect. At most even the best system will find most but not all stowaways, most but not all contraband. It is not nearly so strict a goal as airport security.
The line is not half an hour, not at any of the peak periods where you would want to apply such systems.
Understand as well that the BM community is probably well above average in honesty and integrity. If you had no BLM rules, and there was no gate check at all, just a ticket collection with free tickets for those who can't afford them, my guess is that only a small fraction of the population would ask for the free tickets.I'm not saying we need to do this, and we've never tested this, but it's worthwhile to think about where the floor is. (There already are subsidized tickets of course but they are not free.)
MyDearFriend wrote:I can't believe I'm taking shit from a meat-cake-with-teeth. :lol:
bigdane wrote:That being said, I'm wondering if someone could provide some perspective for me. If I understand correctly, this thread is about efficiency?
bigdane wrote:I expect my experience, as a n00b, will be significantly different... is part of that accomplished by providing me with an altered gate experience? I'm not being glib, but why wouldn't "veterans" want the same loving welcome? And is there some sort of competition for "preferred sites" between "veterans". I respect that I know nothing about BRC and its body politic so please don't misinterpret my observations as critical...just observations without personal substantiation.
Maybe once I've been I'll have a clearer understanding of some of the discussion going on here...but I thought the experience of the moment unfolding was part of the Burning Man adventure?
Savannah wrote:It sounds freaky & wrong, so you need to do it.
Nipple wrote:My take: I'm probably going to volunteer PG&E next year.
lemur wrote:sure, the line isnt fun... but yes, you ARE at burning man, and that excitement does build up and its awesome to finally be there but.. it still wears on mE, .. and others..
Savannah wrote:It sounds freaky & wrong, so you need to do it.
ygmir wrote:Nipple wrote:My take: I'm probably going to volunteer PG&E next year.
+1 especially opening days on gate, early morning and late night.
lemur wrote:dont reduce the line.. it gives people already in the city something to look at in awe on sunday night..
standing on a platform looking out at that line of lights snaking around in the dark, omg its huge.. much saying of "sucks to be them" occurs..
bradtem wrote:Understand as well that the BM community is probably well above average in honesty and integrity. If you had no BLM rules, and there was no gate check at all, just a ticket collection with free tickets for those who can't afford them, my guess is that only a small fraction of the population would ask for the free tickets. I'm not saying we need to do this, and we've never tested this, but it's worthwhile to think about where the floor is. (There already are subsidized tickets of course but they are not free.)
bradtem wrote:with free tickets for those who can't afford them
ygmir wrote:Nipple wrote:My take: I'm probably going to volunteer PG&E next year.
+1 especially opening days on gate, early morning and late night.
Nipple wrote:ygmir wrote:Nipple wrote:My take: I'm probably going to volunteer PG&E next year.
+1 especially opening days on gate, early morning and late night.
Depends on if I'm doing early entry this year. If I am, I plan on doing opening day. If I'm not, I'm going to work exodus. Until then, I don't have much to add to this discussion. My pretty basic feeling is that moving people takes time. There are bottlenecks. Some of resolvable, most aren't. Things are going to take the amount of time they take.
The CO wrote:bradtem wrote:Understand as well that the BM community is probably well above average in honesty and integrity. If you had no BLM rules, and there was no gate check at all, just a ticket collection with free tickets for those who can't afford them, my guess is that only a small fraction of the population would ask for the free tickets. I'm not saying we need to do this, and we've never tested this, but it's worthwhile to think about where the floor is. (There already are subsidized tickets of course but they are not free.)
What. The. Fuck.
Go here and read any number of threads from the radically self-entitled about how they should get a free ticket.
In the interest of full disclosure, whenever someone starts talking about how tickets should be free, they lose most all credibility.
I would like to point out one simple thing:bradtem wrote:with free tickets for those who can't afford them
IF YOU CAN'T AFFORD TO BUY A TICKET TO BURNING MAN, YOU CAN'T AFFORD TO GO TO BURNING MAN.
"Free tickets for those who can't afford them" would attract every lazy, mooching, self-entitled ass-hat in the civilized world.
Seriously. I love the fact that you have to work your ass off to go to BRC. Those that think it should be free are..... wait for it...
DOING IT WRONG.

bradtem wrote:I often do spend the night before up in the Reno area. This is the point. It's not that you can't enjoy that. This issue is in fact that it has pretty much become a must if you want to arrive during the day, and still a majority of burners come from the nearby zones.
Burning Man is a large investment of time. I expect that. I just think it's better if I (and others) spend that time preparing, or on the playa building art than waiting in lines. I expect people to say "That plan has problems because...." but I don't readily accept the answer that "waiting in line is part of burning man." It may be part of it now, but it's not an essential part.
Yes, there is the argument that every adversity of the playa -- remoteness, dust storms, heat, waiting in line -- selects for people who are serious about being there, and reduces those coming for a "weekend party with topless girls." But that logic would turn any negative into a positive, and that's not how to work things out.
The things done at gate -- collecting tickets, keeping out stowaways, checking for and reminding people not to bring in moopy things and contraband -- have value to the city. But the value is not absolute. There are trade-offs and there are negatives. The long waits. The unfairness of lines that go at very different speeds. Making your first experience of the playa be "and now we're going to search you" rather than "welcome home." The land-grab. These are not insignificant negatives, though I realize that people can disagree about how negative they are.
Dr Helix wrote:I may not agree with you, but I respect somebody that's as committed to a subject as you seem to be.
Savannah wrote:It sounds freaky & wrong, so you need to do it.
lemur wrote:tip:
otherwise?
deal with it.
bradtem wrote:I often do spend the night before up in the Reno area. This is the point. It's not that you can't enjoy that. This issue is in fact that it has pretty much become a must if you want to arrive during the day, and still a majority of burners come from the nearby zones.
Burning Man is a large investment of time. I expect that. I just think it's better if I (and others) spend that time preparing, or on the playa building art than waiting in lines. I expect people to say "That plan has problems because...." but I don't readily accept the answer that "waiting in line is part of burning man." It may be part of it now, but it's not an essential part.
Yes, there is the argument that every adversity of the playa -- remoteness, dust storms, heat, waiting in line -- selects for people who are serious about being there, and reduces those coming for a "weekend party with topless girls." But that logic would turn any negative into a positive, and that's not how to work things out.
The things done at gate -- collecting tickets, keeping out stowaways, checking for and reminding people not to bring in moopy things and contraband -- have value to the city. But the value is not absolute. There are trade-offs and there are negatives. The long waits. The unfairness of lines that go at very different speeds. Making your first experience of the playa be "and now we're going to search you" rather than "welcome home." The land-grab. These are not insignificant negatives, though I realize that people can disagree about how negative they are.
Return to Politics & Philosophy
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests