ygmir wrote:ah, but I did vote......just not for either major.........it is very acceptable, to choose "E: none of the above".....protest is just that.
There can be honor, in taking the third path (not rail). A person can reject the choices offered, knowing out there, better exists......choosing one, just for the sake of choosing, though valid, is no better than holding your nose and drinking the cool aid........if enough folks, would consider "none of the above", a message might be sent.
one might consider the "occupy" movement, at least in it's infancy as having said that.
some of us are tired of the "status quo" and taking what's offered, on bended knee, and being thankful to "the parties" for giving us such stellar choices.........
I'm not against 50 separate countries, at this point.
Freedom is just that.........freedom to say no, to both.
ygmir wrote:yet there are also times, IMHO, that a person has to stand and say "the choices you offer me are both bad, and I'll not choose either", like having a turd sandwich or bowl of piss soup.....which tastes worse?
I choose to skip that meal.
MyDearFriend wrote:I can't believe I'm taking shit from a meat-cake-with-teeth. :lol:
BBadger wrote:ygmir wrote:yet there are also times, IMHO, that a person has to stand and say "the choices you offer me are both bad, and I'll not choose either", like having a turd sandwich or bowl of piss soup.....which tastes worse?
I choose to skip that meal.
Then you must also be willing to stand and keep your mouth shut when decisions are made--for better or worse--in the absence of your vote.
I would like to see a negative vote entry for, so you can vote against a person, even if not specifically for another.
ygmir wrote:I disagree BBadger........I did vote, just not for heckle or jeckle........and so, by voting alone ,I retain the right to complain. Had I not voted at all, I might agree, although, depending on the reasoning behind"no vote" it can still be legitimate, IMO.
we are in essence, force fed two turds, and asked to chooose one.........told to choose one, or we are not "patriotic" or "not involved,so shut up".......but I disagree there are only two choices, and with a system that stacks the deck towards same.
How about a dozen, and 6 rounds of voting to get down to one?
How about a up to 3 terms, then he's hung. it'd bring out the altruists, perhaps?
Sort of like the festivals surrounding Rig, in old Teutonic lore.
I
MyDearFriend wrote:I can't believe I'm taking shit from a meat-cake-with-teeth. :lol:
BBadger wrote:ygmir wrote:I disagree BBadger........I did vote, just not for heckle or jeckle........and so, by voting alone ,I retain the right to complain. Had I not voted at all, I might agree, although, depending on the reasoning behind"no vote" it can still be legitimate, IMO.
we are in essence, force fed two turds, and asked to chooose one.........told to choose one, or we are not "patriotic" or "not involved,so shut up".......but I disagree there are only two choices, and with a system that stacks the deck towards same.
How about a dozen, and 6 rounds of voting to get down to one?
How about a up to 3 terms, then he's hung. it'd bring out the altruists, perhaps?
Sort of like the festivals surrounding Rig, in old Teutonic lore.
I
I'd like to see 8-year terms with a no-confidence supermajority option. That way we can actually see if some of the policies actually panned out, and not have to waste half the first term trying to get reelected. It's hard enough to see the results of some policies within 10 years. If he's truly terrible he/she can get ousted too.
As for a multi-round election.... I don't think I could stand the political ads running that long. It's bad enough a whole year gets dedicated to it, and the last month is hell, but multiple rounds would be terrible, even if once every 8 years.
FIGJAM wrote:The last 6 times that the elections were held on the 6th, the republican candidate won.
So there's that.
dragonpilot wrote:OK...everyone happy, now?
Return to Politics & Philosophy
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests