Bob wrote:Do they moop their Molotov cocktails?
Sic Pup wrote:Nise
jkisha wrote:Are you referring us to the National Institute for Science Education or commenting on the previous post? If the latter, please try "Nice"; if the former, my apologies.Sic Pup wrote:Nise
Sic Pup wrote:jkisha wrote:Are you referring us to the National Institute for Science Education or commenting on the previous post? If the latter, please try "Nice"; if the former, my apologies.Sic Pup wrote:Nise
It conveys exactly what I meant to convey.
Irregardless of what others may think I believe if an arrangement of letters successfully communicates a thought to its target audience it's a word.
Maybe it wasn't meant for you? but thanks for the suggestion, I'll take it under advisement.
Sola Gangsta wrote:The time has been long overdue for this. I was wondering why there weren't riots in 1988 after the Keating savings and load scandal, Rodney King, etc... When would people wake up if not for these things?
Since then I've thought of many ways to bring down the leadership as have my friends but everyone is on a different page. If everyone did one of the following in unison it would have widespread consequences and cause a major shift in leadership:
1. Get rid of your cable tv and stop watching television all together.
2. Stop buying from corporations like Walmart, McDonalds, etc. (The vote that really counts is in your wallet, not at the voting booth).
3. Trade with your neighbors in your own currency (barter to start with).
4. If you have Amish farms nearby, support them by paying them for the things that you would have paid corporations.
5. Localize everything you can. Globalization has been hyped to be the "solve everything" solution but it creates more problems than it solves and allows the middle man to come in (government especially). The federal govt is a parasite upon the state governments and likewise the state to county.
There are other options for the above list but I want to point out a fundamental problem which is not what you might think (the economy). The real problem from the perspective of the true rulers of the world is overpopulation. Part of the reason for cutting into prosperity and making us poor is that we are far out-stripping their ability to cope and stay in control. So wars are their favorite solution to keep down the population and stop us from breeding like rabbits. When prosperity comes to the people, they have families and in a generation you have a whole new group much larger than before who need jobs.
I've heard it said that you can fit the entire population of the world in the area the size of Los Angeles. If people would limit their control and elbow room to their shoulders then population would not be much of a problem, but I'm even feeling it out in the desert camping after burning man in the Mt. Charleston area (Spring Mountains). After coming down, I was approached by BLM forest service asking if I'd like to take a survey which had such questions as "Do you feel safe here?, How many times have you visited?, what do you think of the condition of the roads?, etc... (obviously the goal was to see if they could charge entrance fees). I guess I'll have to find someplace else because the main reason I went up there was to not be bothered. As far a safety is concerned, I was curious what threats they perceived? Drug gangs? The greatest dangers up there are rattle snakes and black widows, but she seemed so "civilized" that I was afraid that I'd have to coach her on proper survival and wondered if she even knew what real dangers there were.
jkisha wrote:LOL dare I point out that your use of "irregardless" would make Sarah Palin proud?
jkisha wrote:Believe it or not, words and their usage communicate more about the userthann just their intent.
Edited to apologize. I'm not the grammar police, use whatever words suite your fancy.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest