...................................................TomServo wrote:I french kissed a guy at Burning Man, because a girl told me to. My only complaint was that he hadn't shaved. Wouldn't sleep with a guy, but the experience wasn't all that bad. Never saw the girl again....but the guy, kept us up all night and morning with his fucking dubstep.
JStep wrote:Good post. I often think the big misconception is the view of the spectrum as one of having a fence in the middle and you're either on one side or the other (and no one likes a fence straddler) ... I've come to believe that the spectrum is one with opposite poles and no fence in the middle and most people are somewhere on the spectrum. Some closer to one end, some closer to the middle, but I'm crazy like that. I honestly feel that if we survive another thousand years and evolve we will come to recognize that things we make up like conventional definitions of race and sexual orientation don't really exist in any meaningful sense. It's just our social reinforcements that wont allow us to imagine things any other way. I think the evidence for that is empirical; San Francisco has a lot of GLBT activity because it's tolerant and open. Afghanistan does not because it's a closed minded homophobic social structure. People in San Francisco aren't genetically or intrinsically different from people in Afghanistan, resulting in more people "becoming" GLBT, they just live in and become acculturated to an environment that doesn't insist that they don't exist.
Well, that was a lot longer than I thought it was going to be. (TWSS)


JStep wrote:Good post. I often think the big misconception is the view of the spectrum as one of having a fence in the middle and you're either on one side or the other (and no one likes a fence straddler) ... I've come to believe that the spectrum is one with opposite poles and no fence in the middle and most people are somewhere on the spectrum. Some closer to one end, some closer to the middle, but I'm crazy like that. I honestly feel that if we survive another thousand years and evolve we will come to recognize that things we make up like conventional definitions of race and sexual orientation don't really exist in any meaningful sense. It's just our social reinforcements that wont allow us to imagine things any other way. I think the evidence for that is empirical; San Francisco has a lot of GLBT activity because it's tolerant and open. Afghanistan does not because it's a closed minded homophobic social structure. People in San Francisco aren't genetically or intrinsically different from people in Afghanistan, resulting in more people "becoming" GLBT, they just live in and become acculturated to an environment that doesn't insist that they don't exist.
Well, that was a lot longer than I thought it was going to be. (TWSS)

All I have to add to that is how completely surprised I am every time I hear someone from the openly gay camp dissing someone in the middle.
I mean seriously. WTF????
unjonharley wrote:/
Noticed one thing.. The big excuses
If your bi. it dose not excuse you from your marrage comitment..
I don't care what you call your self.. Jumping in the sack with another person behind your parteners back is wrong..
essjay wrote:JStep wrote:Good post. I often think the big misconception is the view of the spectrum as one of having a fence in the middle and you're either on one side or the other (and no one likes a fence straddler) ... I've come to believe that the spectrum is one with opposite poles and no fence in the middle and most people are somewhere on the spectrum. Some closer to one end, some closer to the middle, but I'm crazy like that. I honestly feel that if we survive another thousand years and evolve we will come to recognize that things we make up like conventional definitions of race and sexual orientation don't really exist in any meaningful sense. It's just our social reinforcements that wont allow us to imagine things any other way. I think the evidence for that is empirical; San Francisco has a lot of GLBT activity because it's tolerant and open. Afghanistan does not because it's a closed minded homophobic social structure. People in San Francisco aren't genetically or intrinsically different from people in Afghanistan, resulting in more people "becoming" GLBT, they just live in and become acculturated to an environment that doesn't insist that they don't exist.
Well, that was a lot longer than I thought it was going to be. (TWSS)
Actually, Afghanistan is VERY gay. They just do it in different ways due to the social constricts that you explained. Just because the religion doesn't allow for open gayness, doesn't mean it doesn't happen. That would be like saying there are no gay priests . . .
http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/docum ... boys.shtml
Trishntek wrote:unjonharley wrote:/
Noticed one thing.. The big excuses
If your bi. it dose not excuse you from your marrage comitment..
I don't care what you call your self.. Jumping in the sack with another person behind your parteners back is wrong..
Trish would flip out if I did anything behind her back,,,, mostly cuz she likes to watch! Being pretty much "gender fluid" myself doubles my chances of being frustrated. But it also doubles my chances of getting fondled![]()
The bears might bite and the unicorns kick, but the Green Faerie merely sits on my nose and tells me, "Keep it simple stupid."
edit:
I just took the test and I guess I pretty much enjoy all humans. Another quiz I took had these results:
Switch
100%
Experimental
100%
Masochist
96%
Exhibitionist / Voyeur
89%
Sadist
89%
Submissive
86%
Bondage
82%
Dominant
68%
Degradation Lover
61%
Vanilla
7%
delle wrote:I've already pretty much said my piece on how I feel about this topic (and especially the Kinsey Report and its scale) in another thread.
delle wrote:
All I have to add to that is how completely surprised I am every time I hear someone from the openly gay camp dissing someone in the middle.
I mean seriously. WTF????
It just seems to me WORSE than the far right straight liners who have no tolerance at all for anything the least bit different..... To me the "ignorant" label for someone who has been through the hardship of coming to terms with their sexuality (when "outside the norm" <--which is a term I will NEVER accept) is a bit of a head scratcher that I'll never quite understand.
Foxfur wrote:I found the test online an hour ago.
That was one long damn test!
...................................................knowmad wrote:
Where was that tread? and would you mind bringing some of that over here?
JStep wrote:essjay wrote:JStep wrote:Good post. I often think the big misconception is the view of the spectrum as one of having a fence in the middle and you're either on one side or the other (and no one likes a fence straddler) ... I've come to believe that the spectrum is one with opposite poles and no fence in the middle and most people are somewhere on the spectrum. Some closer to one end, some closer to the middle, but I'm crazy like that. I honestly feel that if we survive another thousand years and evolve we will come to recognize that things we make up like conventional definitions of race and sexual orientation don't really exist in any meaningful sense. It's just our social reinforcements that wont allow us to imagine things any other way. I think the evidence for that is empirical; San Francisco has a lot of GLBT activity because it's tolerant and open. Afghanistan does not because it's a closed minded homophobic social structure. People in San Francisco aren't genetically or intrinsically different from people in Afghanistan, resulting in more people "becoming" GLBT, they just live in and become acculturated to an environment that doesn't insist that they don't exist.
Well, that was a lot longer than I thought it was going to be. (TWSS)
Actually, Afghanistan is VERY gay. They just do it in different ways due to the social constricts that you explained. Just because the religion doesn't allow for open gayness, doesn't mean it doesn't happen. That would be like saying there are no gay priests . . .
http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/docum ... boys.shtml
Well, I think we might be quibbling over semantics but I meant there being more "glbt avtivity" not in the sense that there are people having sex with others of the same gender, I meant it more as in there is support, there are centers, student groups, etc. It's an accepted mode of being there so there's more evidence of it all around, whereas in oppressive environments there's *apparently* no glbt activity at all.
knowmad wrote:delle wrote:I've already pretty much said my piece on how I feel about this topic (and especially the Kinsey Report and its scale) in another thread.
Where was that tread? and would you mind bringing some of that over here? I started a search but .... You post better than I can read...delle wrote:
All I have to add to that is how completely surprised I am every time I hear someone from the openly gay camp dissing someone in the middle.
I mean seriously. WTF????
It just seems to me WORSE than the far right straight liners who have no tolerance at all for anything the least bit different..... To me the "ignorant" label for someone who has been through the hardship of coming to terms with their sexuality (when "outside the norm" <--which is a term I will NEVER accept) is a bit of a head scratcher that I'll never quite understand.
Agreed.
Early on I recognized that I did not like the Misogynistic mind set that is rampant through out Paternalistic heterosexual culture (or sadly "Culture at large") But the Jaw dropping Show stopper was encountering a Woman hating leather clad Bear of a man loudly berating his boyfriend for asking me what flowers would match what flower pot for a mothers day gift.
Or when my last Girlfriend looked embarrassed because her Bull Dyke friends told her "Well It's not like you got yourself a real man."
Yeah stuff sucks.Foxfur wrote:I found the test online an hour ago.
That was one long damn test!
And Survey says!? .....
*puts one bunny ear down, the other UP!*



graidawg wrote:There are least 2 guys on here i really like (in an erotic way) i may have hinted at that, i dont want sex with them, i want to be there goddamn friend and to get the physical closeness and comfort you can only get from someone you trust. that probably doesn't make a lot of sense
MisaBlue wrote:Sorry, whats the vanilla meaning here?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests