Isotopia wrote:i only read my own posts, that gives me plenty to do.
Behold, the sound of one hand clapping.
Beware of phenols in red lipstick!
Isotopia wrote:i only read my own posts, that gives me plenty to do.
Behold, the sound of one hand clapping.
spectabillis wrote:. im not even a mod anymore, but there will always be a huge amount of animosity just because im the person who tried to pull the eplaya back online.
Simon of the Playa wrote:it's worth fighting for, IMHO.
spectabillis wrote:Bay Bridge Sue wrote:.. I won't ploink this person (as a mod I can't) but I'm waiting to see if the vitriol continues. ..
mods should not plonk people as a basic function of the role sue. i dont think i had that ability pulled, i just errantly trusted mods would know better and why.
AntiM wrote:take the long way to a lifetime at Camarillo.
Eric wrote:spectabillis wrote:. im not even a mod anymore, but there will always be a huge amount of animosity just because im the person who tried to pull the eplaya back online.
I remember "before" very well, and I've never had a problem with any of the mods. I know sometime you could come off a little strong Spect, but you got the job done during a period that makes the worst now look like a playground. If you and the other mods hadn't, I probably would have left permanently, instead of just taking an 18 month break a couple of years ago.
It was ugly in here.
I'd unplonk DVD if he could ever not be a narcissist, but I don't see that happening.

Bob wrote:With 2012, world revolution, etc. around the corner, can we really afford to plonk anyone?
Somebody the other day told me they were saving their seed. What, in a mayonnaise jar?
AntiM wrote:Oh look, winter is here.
wh..sh wrote:Plonked none as of today, clearly I am doing something wrong.
TomServo wrote:Pickles are cucumbers soaked in EVIL!

theCryptofishist wrote:Multiple. I bet some of you could do a fairly close guess as to whom.
Nipple wrote:theCryptofishist wrote:Multiple. I bet some of you could do a fairly close guess as to whom.
Look! I SAID I was SORRY!
theCryptofishist wrote:Multiple. I bet some of you could do a fairly close guess as to whom.
Savannah wrote:It sounds freaky & wrong, so you need to do it.
junglesmacks wrote:theCryptofishist wrote:Multiple. I bet some of you could do a fairly close guess as to whom.
Gee Fishy, who would that be?
tamarakay wrote:junglesmacks wrote:theCryptofishist wrote:Multiple. I bet some of you could do a fairly close guess as to whom.
Gee Fishy, who would that be?
pssssst, she can't see that
Savannah wrote:It sounds freaky & wrong, so you need to do it.
ygmir wrote:I know of one person who has me plonked, I'm sure there are more. It's sort of funny, to see the non sequitur posts that come from not seeing everything in a thread.........
Savannah wrote:It sounds freaky & wrong, so you need to do it.
junglesmacks wrote:ygmir wrote:I know of one person who has me plonked, I'm sure there are more. It's sort of funny, to see the non sequitur posts that come from not seeing everything in a thread.........
I do think it's funny as well, but also find it kind of a sad statement about the plonker that they're not resilient enough to deal with opposing personalities and viewpoints and perhaps take things like this board way too serious to an almost unhealthy point. To me, everything in life is the spice of life. Variety in people and personalities are what make up this world. Just because I don't like what someone has to say doesn't mean that I feel like I need to wear blinders and stick my fingers in my ears while going NANANANANANANANANANANANA so I can't hear them. That's just childish and I would expect more and especially from this crowd.
..but hey.. that's just me. To each their own..


Users browsing this forum: FIGJAM and 5 guests