Kinetic II wrote:My latest toy: http://www.pcdj.com/Products/Hardware/DAC-2.asp
Somebody has to make the stuff your streaming. Toys like this are another way to do it.
And are you paying someone for server space to handle your feed or are you running it yourself?
Don Muerto wrote:III wrote:while i'll admit that potential, i suspect that people would be inclined to ignore the thread up front, rather than actually have a discussion there. and should it happen that a thread owner interferes negatively with a particular conversation, the conversees are free to create a new thread owned by one of the to continue it.
I agree with this, and believe it would work for the 3playa as it is, but what do you think would happen if this feature were implemented here where you have a larger, less sophisticated user base?
DE FACTO wrote:Well Alchemy looks like I'm the only one
that is willing to step up to the plate with
an example again. I still love these people. They are just too funny.
Sometimes they are so smart they tend to forget
that they are human. They need to be reminded
every now and then. Dont we all.
Well Alchemy, it happened again. they continuously make mistake after mistake
Wind_Borne wrote:During the 2000 election Bush-vs.-Gore debates, when Gore would say something that Bush thought was off-target, Bush would respond "Well now, there you go again, blah, blah blah."
So I have to laugh when DeFacto starts a post with something likeWell Alchemy, it happened again. they continuously make mistake after mistake
Could it be... DeFacto is POTUS
DE FACTO wrote:Wind_Borne wrote:I did in fact dare.
But if I'm wrong, who have I insulted? POTUS or DE FACTO?
You know something.....I just cant think of anything for that one.
You win.
SED wrote:I guess you all know this, but what fucking huge circle jerk this is.
Is it that much fun? Are your personal lives so bleak that any of this stupid bullshit is worth even a few seconds?
stuart wrote:ummm, do you fail to see the irony in posting that message?
As for me, my life is at least not so bleak as to warrant multiple identities on a single BBS.
stuart wrote:SED wrote:I guess you all know this, but what fucking huge circle jerk this is.
Is it that much fun? Are your personal lives so bleak that any of this stupid bullshit is worth even a few seconds?
ummm, do you fail to see the irony in posting that message?
As for me, my life is at least not so bleak as to warrant multiple identities on a single BBS.
SED wrote:I see your point, Stuart. I don't agree with it, but I see it. Regarding the multiple ID thought, there's no way you can prove you don't use more than one ID. You seem ballsy enough that it might actually be your real face and name, but if if you've got that much sack, why not go all the way and post your full name, address and phone number?
you've got that much sack, why not go all the way and post your full name, address and phone number?
Lydia Love wrote:you've got that much sack, why not go all the way and post your full name, address and phone number?
Weird that being genuine, or even remotely consistent would be considered an act of courage or something.
SED wrote:
Can you explain that a little more?
I'll cop to the fact that I use one other ID, but I think it's pretty consistent with SED.
Look folks, if it really bothers anyone, I'll stop. I just enjoy having the option.
Seems like this BBS could use less bullshit anyway.
Users browsing this forum: JayBobBoy and 2 guests