technopatra wrote:I encourage everyone to participate in this process as much they can, either by coming to a meeting (next one will be in early Nov, tbd) or continuing to talk with us here.
Isotopia wrote:Was the topic of Trey's ass pic addressed?
precipitate wrote: You've found a method
of dealing with it: minimize the size of the window. You could also turn
off image loading by default in your browser and load things on demand.
But it should be your issue to deal with, not ours.
precipitate wrote:Ahem. Sunshine and roses not ahead.
Tiara wrote:caution: playful comment follows. No need for committee action to be taken on this suggestion.
Kinetic II wrote:Precip, you missed my point entirely. What I am looking for is a variation of what you just posted. A nice little disclaimer saying that the following picture or item might not be suitable for viewing in a work environment, or it might be disturbing. Or in your last post, a bit direct (which is good).
Kinetic II wrote:I'm sure I will have plenty of backing on this. However this is where the eplaya task force is looking for ideas. If you think it stinks, speak up. If you like it, say so. I'm stepping back and listening instead of posting.
nipples wrote: I will most likely stop coming here altogether if there is not a "plonk" option installed,
nipples wrote:(then simply do not open that thread), .
Kinetic II wrote:You mentioned censorship. Personally, I don't have time nor have ANY desire to censor anything. I fully exploit my first amendment rights...and we'll leave it at that. I'm looking at this from another perspective. COPA: The Children's Online Protection Act. The ORG is under a legal obligation to comply with this law and others that are on the books.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest