MyDearFriend wrote:I can't believe I'm taking shit from a meat-cake-with-teeth. :lol:
BBadger wrote:Oh the complicated web we weave. It's like following "thou shalt not kill" and having to decide between killing a gunman before he kills other people, or staying "pure" and not being involved. Is it for the "greater good" to rent this vehicle out for a day or two, or fundamentally compromising your principles, or both?
What more, what if someone not from an PnP camp asked to rent the vehicle, with the same cost/conditions, but to transport physically disabled people? Is the decision now justified because you think you're doing it for a good cause? The vehicle is still being "rented" out in either case. Are the principles more important than pragmatic decisions?
Not for me to decide.
Moral dilemma aside, I'd be more concerned about liability. Are the operators going to be trustworthy? What if they damage your vehicle? You better get all this in writing if you decide to rent that vehicle out.
TomServo wrote:BBadger wrote:Oh the complicated web we weave. It's like following "thou shalt not kill" and having to decide between killing a gunman before he kills other people, or staying "pure" and not being involved. Is it for the "greater good" to rent this vehicle out for a day or two, or fundamentally compromising your principles, or both?
What more, what if someone not from an PnP camp asked to rent the vehicle, with the same cost/conditions, but to transport physically disabled people? Is the decision now justified because you think you're doing it for a good cause? The vehicle is still being "rented" out in either case. Are the principles more important than pragmatic decisions?
Not for me to decide.
Moral dilemma aside, I'd be more concerned about liability. Are the operators going to be trustworthy? What if they damage your vehicle? You better get all this in writing if you decide to rent that vehicle out.
They wouldn't need to rent an MV for disabled. DMV gives permits for disabled burners. I doubt renting a MV would be much of an issue, if the customer wasn't already making money off other burners.
theCryptofishist wrote:TomServo wrote:BBadger wrote:Oh the complicated web we weave. It's like following "thou shalt not kill" and having to decide between killing a gunman before he kills other people, or staying "pure" and not being involved. Is it for the "greater good" to rent this vehicle out for a day or two, or fundamentally compromising your principles, or both?
What more, what if someone not from an PnP camp asked to rent the vehicle, with the same cost/conditions, but to transport physically disabled people? Is the decision now justified because you think you're doing it for a good cause? The vehicle is still being "rented" out in either case. Are the principles more important than pragmatic decisions?
Not for me to decide.
Moral dilemma aside, I'd be more concerned about liability. Are the operators going to be trustworthy? What if they damage your vehicle? You better get all this in writing if you decide to rent that vehicle out.
They wouldn't need to rent an MV for disabled. DMV gives permits for disabled burners. I doubt renting a MV would be much of an issue, if the customer wasn't already making money off other burners.
I gather it's more complicated than that.
Bob wrote:Such delicate flowers. A camp wants to patronize artists, and offered grant money, presumably negotiated off-playa. How is this so complicated, or different from what the org does?
He who climbs high mountains, laughs at all tragic plays and tragic realities.
You tell me, "Life is hard to bear." But why should you have your pride in the morning and your resignation in the evening?
Life is hard to bear: but do not pretend to be so delicate! We are all of us fine sumpter asses and she-asses.
What do we have in common with the rose-bud, which trembles because a drop of dew lies on it?
It is true we love life; not because we are wont to live, but because we are wont to love.
There is always some madness in love. But there is always, also, some method in madness.
driver8 wrote:It seems BM has evolved over the last 5 years, especially - into an experience that can be packaged and sold. It has become predictable (not that that's a bad thing) and that makes it is easy to market; you pay this amount and this is what you will get in trade. That's just the way it is. If you want radical spontaneity (i suppose it still exists out there in way of accidents) - this is not the place for you. Personally, predictability doesn't repulse me. I like things that are certain and included a real possibility for surprise in way of happy accidents. So they way things have become suits me. I have no complaints.
driver8 wrote:It seems BM has evolved over the last 5 years, especially - into an experience that can be packaged and sold. It has become predictable (not that that's a bad thing) and that makes it is easy to market; you pay this amount and this is what you will get in trade. That's just the way it is. If you want radical spontaneity (i suppose it still exists out there in way of accidents) - this is not the place for you. Personally, predictability doesn't repulse me. I like things that are certain and included a real possibility for surprise in way of happy accidents. So they way things have become suits me. I have no complaints.
Mutant Vehicle Criteria
In order to be eligible for a Mutant Vehicle license you must satisfy ALL of the following criteria:
There are five main points the DMV considers when reviewing your vehicle.
1. Level of Mutation
Mutate your vehicle to the point that it is not recognizable as a street vehicle. A radically mutated vehicle will not resemble or represent a car, truck, golf cart or any other readily identifiable street vehicle. Is the vehicle radically mutated or is the exterior a temporary decoration that required little or no actual mutation of the base vehicle?
2. Interactivity
Provide an interactive experience for participants of Black Rock City. Interactivity is defined as an opportunity for any BRC citizen to participate in some activity offered by your vehicle. The theme and/or size of the vehicle is what's considered here. Do you entertain a crowd? Have plenty of room for riders? Provide a service to the community via your vehicle? Include an interactive element?
3. Safety
Depending on the size and style of your vehicle, some or all of the following may apply: The vehicle must be able to maintain a steady speed of five MPH (the speed limit in Black Rock City) or less. Brakes must be in good working order. The vehicle should have sturdy side railings and stair railings. There should be no sharp or protruding objects. A fire extinguisher is highly recommended. Keeping a first aid kit on board is just plain smart. The vehicle should also have a safe access area and procedures for loading and unloading passengers.
4. Lighting
For vehicles seeking a night license, basic requirements must be met: The rear, front AND sides must be lit. All vehicle extremities must be lit. Any trailer hitch or dangerous area of the vehicle must be lit. Anywhere someone would walk, step, or climb on your vehicle should be lit, especially stairs and ladders.
5. Sound
The DMV has a new Sound Policy for Mutant Vehicles. It is important that you know it. Please go here to review the policy. All vehicles driving in Black Rock City must follow the sound policy.
lemur wrote:(ok no not really.. i think this shit is stupid and even though it seems like the original poster is already sending off paypal/bank account numbers and drawing up a contract.. i still suggest he say "NO, FUCK OFF OFF ASSHOLES"... but yep, yer right, if they dont get him to take the money, theyll find someone else.. with 700+ mutant vehicles out there,.. it aint like theres a shortage of fuckwads who would take money to allow one of these businesses to operate and provide amenities for the clients )
Dr. Pyro wrote:Perhaps my moral compass isn't pointing directly north, but I agree with your buddy in this individual case.

TomServo wrote:BBadger wrote:What more, what if someone not from an PnP camp asked to rent the vehicle, with the same cost/conditions, but to transport physically disabled people? Is the decision now justified because you think you're doing it for a good cause? The vehicle is still being "rented" out in either case. Are the principles more important than pragmatic decisions?
They wouldn't need to rent an MV for disabled. DMV gives permits for disabled burners. I doubt renting a MV would be much of an issue, if the customer wasn't already making money off other burners.
MyDearFriend wrote:I can't believe I'm taking shit from a meat-cake-with-teeth. :lol:
Trishntek wrote:WHAT MOTIVATES YOU TO GO TO TTITD?
BBadger wrote:TomServo wrote:BBadger wrote:What more, what if someone not from an PnP camp asked to rent the vehicle, with the same cost/conditions, but to transport physically disabled people? Is the decision now justified because you think you're doing it for a good cause? The vehicle is still being "rented" out in either case. Are the principles more important than pragmatic decisions?
They wouldn't need to rent an MV for disabled. DMV gives permits for disabled burners. I doubt renting a MV would be much of an issue, if the customer wasn't already making money off other burners.
Er, that wasn't meant to be a specific case, but more of an example. Replace "physically disabled people" with "whatever cause most people would consider good." The question posed is more to ask if renting MVs--for money or trade--is only reprehensible in the context of PnP camps, or does it also extend to any people or camps, including those whom are considered a worthy cause. Aaand the point of that question is more to point out the moral gray area these kinds of situations often reside in.
Return to 2012 Mutant Vehicles
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest