Oso wrote:Great posting, bradtem. It is possible.
.
"Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible"
- The number of scientists and engineers who confidently stated that heavier-than-air flight was impossible in the run-up to the Wright brothers' flight is too large to count. Lord Kelvin is probably the best-known.
Eric wrote:Oso wrote:Great posting, bradtem. It is possible.
.
"Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible"
- The number of scientists and engineers who confidently stated that heavier-than-air flight was impossible in the run-up to the Wright brothers' flight is too large to count. Lord Kelvin is probably the best-known.
No one doubts the possibility of adding lanes, it's quite possible. It is, however, highly improbable, which is completely different.
Look, most of us would love to see the capacity of the event increase so more people could attend (well, honestly I would love it even more if only 50,000 people or less wanted to attend, but that ain't happening); the reality is that we now need to look at useful solutions for the ticketing- all the while remembering that "fair" doesn't equal "everyone gets a ticket", sadly. Dreaming of spending millions of other peoples money to fix a road to our party is a little selfish, IMHO.
Eric wrote:Dreaming of spending millions of other peoples money to fix a road to our party is a little selfish, IMHO.
JStep wrote:Eric wrote:Dreaming of spending millions of other peoples money to fix a road to our party is a little selfish, IMHO.
Now now Eric, don't jump to conclusions. I assume you're referring to my post above, and I never said anything about spending "other people's" money. I mentioned the possibility that private entities can (and do- like, all the time) donate funds to help with a public works type project when the ends are beneficial to both parties.
Reel it back in, partner.

Savannah wrote:It sounds freaky & wrong, so you need to do it.
junglesmacks wrote: the other half of the equation is still the actual playa and the (perceived) environmental impact that tens of thousands of people have on an ecosystem. Assuming that the BLM would take the road widening into consideration, there is still a set number that the event cannot and would not be allowed to grow past.
Zeke Chaparral wrote:I take it not many people here have been to hajj. They are going to build a train that goes to Mecca for the sole purpose of the pilgrimage.
JStep wrote:Eric wrote:Dreaming of spending millions of other peoples money to fix a road to our party is a little selfish, IMHO.
Now now Eric, don't jump to conclusions. I assume you're referring to my post above, and I never said anything about spending "other people's" money. I mentioned the possibility that private entities can (and do- like, all the time) donate funds to help with a public works type project when the ends are beneficial to both parties.
Reel it back in, partner.

theCryptofishist wrote:JStep wrote:Eric wrote:Dreaming of spending millions of other peoples money to fix a road to our party is a little selfish, IMHO.
Now now Eric, don't jump to conclusions. I assume you're referring to my post above, and I never said anything about spending "other people's" money. I mentioned the possibility that private entities can (and do- like, all the time) donate funds to help with a public works type project when the ends are beneficial to both parties.
Reel it back in, partner.
JStep, you might not be aware that road-widening has been proposed in multiple threads in this subforum. It's possible that Eric really wasn't talking to you, as much as the idea that has been propose in general.
ygmir wrote:well, that and so much of this speculation, and the proposals, though "possible" are impractical and "not going to happen"........we might as well propose a monorail, from Wadsworth, running a loop so we can have a train every 15 mins.
yeah, possible, but..............
theCryptofishist wrote:Hoverbikes.
This solution endorsed by Simon of the Playa, Liz Estrada, Roberto Dobbisano and sundry others.

ygmir wrote:theCryptofishist wrote:Hoverbikes.
This solution endorsed by Simon of the Playa, Liz Estrada, Roberto Dobbisano and sundry others.
you know this will devolve into a "locking your hoverbike, who gets to use the green ones, and for how long, how do we catch thieves", discussion.
JStep wrote:Thanks Fishy. Maybe that was it.
stretch80 wrote:I have recently decided that I needed to step up and not just shoot other eplayian's ideas down. Maybe offer suggestions of my own.
ZaphodBurner wrote:
The difference between buying a ticket from a scalper and prostituting yourself for one is, if you suck dick for a ticket and brag about it, burners will still respect you.
"Transporting really is the safest way to travel."Trishntek wrote:It's time for the Gene Roddenberry archives to be opened and the spec sheet for the Star Trek Transporter to be released."Transporting really is the safest way to travel."
- Geordi La Forge, 2369
theCryptofishist wrote:Zeke Chaparral wrote:I take it not many people here have been to hajj. They are going to build a train that goes to Mecca for the sole purpose of the pilgrimage.
Okay. Few of us are of the appropriate religion to be allowed to go on hajj.
And
We are talking about an oil-rich country which can make that sort of choice, the combination of money and political power and religious duty is very powerful--and we can't make that a claim to have that by orders of magnitude.
MyDearFriend wrote:I can't believe I'm taking shit from a meat-cake-with-teeth. :lol:

Savannah wrote:It sounds freaky & wrong, so you need to do it.
Return to 2012 Tickets Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest