kp_higgs wrote:So, I guess a scalper and a person can make a side arrangement to gift tickets on the website...but thats so sketchy its on par with the (fake) Nigerian DubStep camp scam. Would people really do that?
I think scalpers, finding no takers for their electronic tickets, would just release them back to the site and make their face value back...giving real burners a chance for their waitlist ticket.
No paper tickets means relatively no market for scalpers.
kp_higgs wrote:...all tickets will be picked up at the gate with and ID (unless transferred as I talk about above).
theCryptofishist wrote:kp_higgs wrote:...all tickets will be picked up at the gate with and ID (unless transferred as I talk about above).
Expect huge issues at gate. And I don't know what would happen if someone doesn't have a ticket and the ride just drives into BRC...That could be very nasty...
kp_higgs wrote:stretch80:
Sure, with the current way the gate works, there would certainly be a cluster. But, I'm saying that we restructure the infrastructure and the way things are done to allow this system to work.
Ok, what if everyone were "will call," how would we structure the gate and entry system to most efficiently allow this? We would definitely need to change the way the entry gate works. This would require ticket takers with mobile devices or scanners to process the people in each car...we would need more volunteers for gate. We can make it work, after all, we are burners.
I think the assumption that this is just high demand cant rule our actions....without making sure the high demand isnt from non-burners wanting to make a few hundred (or more) dollars by scalping their paper ticket.
I think the STEP program, as they describe it, is a good start. But we also need to be able to gift without paper tickets, and the next step falls naturally....remove paper tickets entirely.
stretch80 wrote:The playa is unusually hard on electronics. Imagine trying to keep it functioning in a constant dust storm... would need to communicate with a central server... lets say 7 backups per gate, thats about 63 devices.... Paper tickets don't crash.
igor47 wrote:
the servers being overwhelmed by load from ticket sales. barcode scanners that work in the desert. a website to exchange tickets. all of these things are so painfully easy to solve it makes me cry! so stop using that as an excuse. our problems are not technical, they're social. people are much harder to figure out than electrons.
what lemur thinks wrote:some arm chair expert wrote:"That doesnt seem so hard.. I took economics 101 AND electrical engineering 101... This problem would be easily solvable if people like ME were working on it.. This is so painfully easy that it makes me CRY!!!"
i see this re-hashed on the forums over and over again. the people who work information technology for bmorg do a very good job. now, i'm sure they're overworked and underpaid and do it because they love it, but in the meantime they've conditioned a lot of burners to expect that theyll get the job done, no matter what the conditions are... the results might not be the best, and sometimes shit will go wrong.. but theyll git er done.
technology in the desert is FUCKING HARD. look at all those artists putting together all sorts of blinky art on the playa. a lot of the time, these people are inventing the technology they're using as they go. after they're done inventing it, they dust-proof it and then it breaks and they feel really sad.
the servers being overwhelmed by load from ticket sales even happens to big names like TicketMaster. barcode scanners that work in the desert. a website to exchange tickets. all of these things are so much more complex than it seems that it makes me cry just to think about it ! so stop using "HEY I AM AN INTERNET EXPERT I CAN FIX IT" as an excuse. our problems are not SO EASILY SOLVED., they're fuckin hard.. people who are much more experienced than me have figured out a way that works for them in the conditions they have to deal with..
ZaphodBurner wrote:I'm not sure if this idea has been posted yet because I've been at work at can't keep up.
After hashing it out with a bunch of PDX camps this weekend, we camp up with the following thoughts. The ticket problem is like a stock market crash; artists, musicians, camps and performers are reluctant to invest. Camps are dropping out because they're hearing that camps are dropping out.
Take 1000 of remaining tickets and distribute, say, a maximum of 5-10 as necessary (at full price) to camps that request them. That would stimulate 100-200 camps to get to work.
For example, my camp is The Green Hour. We have one ticket out of 20 campers. If we can buy 7 more tickets before April, we can bring root beer, absinthe, publically-rideable mutant vehicles, playa art, lights, music, a public shade structure and chill space, and a reputation of being an LNT camp every year we've gone. Or, they could sell 8 tickets at random and risk losing some percentage to scalpers and Girls Gone Wild types. 8 of our camp veterans can bring all this, and welcome x-amount of people--virgins welcome!--to join us. It leaves 90% of the extra tickets available to the general population AND stimulates the collective planning and construction process.
I believe most individuals who make an effort to go will get a ticket in time. We just need to inject the collaborative participants with a sense of hope. Thoughts?
lemur wrote:since it appears easy to you... we should just shutup about it?
lemur wrote:we arent talking about fricken BLINKIES here.
lemur wrote:also, if you really do think you can offer real solutions: volunteer or contact the departments that are relevant
igor47 wrote:lol. armchair expert my ass. my software controls datacenters full of tens of thousands of servers, which must stay up no matter what, and the amount of money flowing through the pipes at those datacenters is WAAAAY more than a measly $20m.
igor47 wrote:lemur, why are we arguing here, and what are we arguing about? you claimed that since i talked the big talk I should offer my expertise to the org, and I agreed and thanked you.
so the only other difference of opinion we have is: i think we should involve technology in smoothing the ticket process; i think the technical problems are solvable, and that we shouldn't let them distract us from the real issues.
what do you think? they're not solvable? they're too hard to solve? we should throw our hands up in the air and... what?
MyDearFriend wrote:I can't believe I'm taking shit from a meat-cake-with-teeth. :lol:
BBadger wrote:If I recall, the servers last year were utilizing Amazon's cloud computing service which had more than enough hardware to handle the computational load. However, I believe the database system itself was ovewhelmed and that was what caused the problems, maybe from fragmentation or something, something which even brought Microsoft's database servers to their knees when distributing Windows 7 RC.
Barcode scanners, network syncing and uplink stuff at the gate, etc... yeah, it could be done, but it really doesn't solve the critical issues now. It's kind of like all those moronic moral issues like partial birth abortions that get addressed by presidential candidates instead of more pressing, important issues like the economy. Quite frankly, using barcode scanners, networked gates, whatever, is not going to speed up anything in any meaningful manner. It's not like we're contending with lots of counterfeit tickets. Nor is having some fancy new system to transfer tickets going to do anything more than the current system, because it's just not a problem.
BBadger wrote:If I recall, the servers last year were utilizing Amazon's cloud computing service which had more than enough hardware to handle the computational load. However, I believe the database system itself was ovewhelmed and that was what caused the problems, maybe from fragmentation or something, something which even brought Microsoft's database servers to their knees when distributing Windows 7 RC.

igor47 wrote:stretch80 wrote:The playa is unusually hard on electronics. Imagine trying to keep it functioning in a constant dust storm... would need to communicate with a central server... lets say 7 backups per gate, thats about 63 devices.... Paper tickets don't crash.
i see this re-hashed on the forums over and over again. the people who work information technology for bmorg don't do a very good job. now, i'm sure they're overworked and underpaid and do it because they love it, but in the meantime they've conditioned a lot of burners to expect that IT is... hard.
technology is FUCKING EASY. look at all those artists putting together all sorts of blinky art on the playa. a lot of the time, these people are inventing the technology they're using as they go. after they're done inventing it, they dust-proof it and then make it work with minimal supervision in the harsh environment on the playa, and they do it on the smallest budget they can cobble together. this, if anything, should convince people that our problems are NOT technical.
the servers being overwhelmed by load from ticket sales. barcode scanners that work in the desert. a website to exchange tickets. all of these things are so painfully easy to solve it makes me cry! so stop using that as an excuse. our problems are not technical, they're social. people are much harder to figure out than electrons.
BBadger wrote:If I recall, the servers last year were utilizing Amazon's cloud computing service which had more than enough hardware to handle the computational load. However, I believe the database system itself was ovewhelmed and that was what caused the problems, maybe from fragmentation or something, something which even brought Microsoft's database servers to their knees when distributing Windows 7 RC.
Barcode scanners, network syncing and uplink stuff at the gate, etc... yeah, it could be done, but it really doesn't solve the critical issues now. It's kind of like all those moronic moral issues like partial birth abortions that get addressed by presidential candidates instead of more pressing, important issues like the economy. Quite frankly, using barcode scanners, networked gates, whatever, is not going to speed up anything in any meaningful manner. It's not like we're contending with lots of counterfeit tickets. Nor is having some fancy new system to transfer tickets going to do anything more than the current system, because it's just not a problem.
Colonel Monk wrote:
UPS uses handheld scanners and they are banging on everything and blah blah - I really don't think it could be that bad.
5 years from now? Yeah, if they replace those scanners as often as their ranger radios (at failure) then there might be an issue but no well built scanner is gonna die in just a few days of influx.
UPS, which has an annual IT budget of $1bn, is currently involved in a number of other major IT projects
http://www.computerweekly.com/feature/U ... ery-alerts
Project Costs and Benefits
UPS has estimated the total cost of the project at around $150 million. Senior executives point out that the resulting increase in market share — let alone retention of the company’s competitive edge — completely justifies the investment
http://www.mobileinfo.com/Case_Study/ups.htm
Return to 2012 Tickets Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests