
5280MeV wrote:It may also be the case that the BMorg cannot currently speak with a unified voice.
I really cannot imagine that they are sitting around drinking champagne and ignoring the community response. I also doubt that everyone is in agreement on a proper course of action. I expect that some of the arguments being had down here are mirrored by equally passionate arguments in the organization's offices. Once they have agreed on a response, if they even can agree on one, I expect that they will send out a JRS.
I am relatively new here, and don't know anyone personally at the office, so this is just my guess, but I think it is reasonable.
mshaman wrote: But the way this situation was handled has caused me to ask the question because it violates so many basic principles of organization. Unfortunately, we are not shareholders, can't elect board members, and can't oust incompetent actors. It is a private, for-profit corporation with no tangible accountability to those who depend on it to work.
Arcticcircle wrote:Predictions of this precise situation abounded pre-lottery, and the Borg didn't pay attention. Members of the community who pressed the issue were belittled by a handful of lottery drumbeaters, and now we've found that -- indeed -- everything you need to know about this system could have been predicted by a couple of introductory courses in psychology and economics. Or, hell, good intuition.
Where WAS the Borg when people were bringing up their concerns? Where IS the Borg now? I know Marian responded to that one reporter from the SF paper this afternoon, but I think the massive overhaul followed by compete stonewall has been strange and disappointing to say the least.
At this stage, I see two options for the Borg:
1) Start over. Literally pull the entire lottery and run a new distribution mechanism. It's kind of fucked at this stage because the lottery caused such a brouhaha that every scalper and profiteer on planet earth knows to exploit BRC to the hilt, so I think a straight sale with printed ticket names is as close to perfect as we could possibly hope for, flaws notwithstanding.
2) Go for it. Declare 2012 to be your balls out experimental phase and tell us we were guinea pigs in a grand scheme to re-invent the festival. Honestly, that would be a much easier pill to swallow and embrace than this limp, stressful, divisive and poorly-considered excuse of a ticket distribution system inflicted upon our community.
Hey BORG, 1 or 2? Or something else? What? I can't hear you! Cat got your tongue, Borg?
Boijoy wrote:shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh they are thinking.
mshaman wrote:Clearly BRC Llc has undermined the trust of the community with the decision to go to a lottery system, the make-it-up-as-we-go-along approach to purchase policy and public relations, and the "it'll be fine" message when it's obviously not. It is a psychological/emotional blow to camps and art collectives not just to have to wait until Feb 1, but to have to wait until July to see how the STEP program will work and if they can get tickets. By then it's too late. Expect it to be a lean year for large-scale undertakings. It is the biggest PR debacle the LLC has ever faced. And I maintain that it will take years for the LLC to recover the respect and trust of its community. If it ever wants to do so, it must offer a fundamental change in action, policy, and PR strategy.
Having worked at a major corporation and been a consultant for several others, I frequently witnessed the peter-principle in action, where someone would rise to their level of incompetence. HP used to take their best engineers and promote them to become engineering managers. Thus they would lose a good engineer, and gain a terrible manager. This was very evident in small businesses, too, where an owner of an LLC couldn't grow beyond his own shadow because of the inability to delegate, lack of financial acumen, etc. It's very possible that festival has simply grown beyond the current BRC Llc staff's skill-level. They haven't hired me as a consultant, I haven't studied their staff, so I can't rightly say. But the way this situation was handled has caused me to ask the question because it violates so many basic principles of organization. Unfortunately, we are not shareholders, can't elect board members, and can't oust incompetent actors. It is a private, for-profit corporation with no tangible accountability to those who depend on it to work.
So I really do resonate with the sentiment expressed by many here: If trust is to be regained, the errors must be admitted, the community must be listened to, and the Llc must present well-engineered solutions that they have actually been thought through before implementing them. At this point, my faith is SO damaged that it would take moving to an open-book, non-profit structure for me to be anything but guarded about the actions and leadership of the corporation.
tamarakay wrote:Sorry, I received tickets in the lottery, and you would have one hell of a bloody fight on your hands trying to get me to return them.
5280MeV wrote:It may also be the case that the BMorg cannot currently speak with a unified voice.
I really cannot imagine that they are sitting around drinking champagne and ignoring the community response. I also doubt that everyone is in agreement on a proper course of action. I expect that some of the arguments being had down here are mirrored by equally passionate arguments in the organization's offices. Once they have agreed on a response, if they even can agree on one, I expect that they will send out a JRS.
ZaphodBurner wrote:tamarakay wrote:Sorry, I received tickets in the lottery, and you would have one hell of a bloody fight on your hands trying to get me to return them.
What do the tickets actually look like?
Or did you just get an e-mail confirmation and a promise?
Dustyrusty wrote:When all LLC decisions are made on a consensus basis (i.e. everybody has to agree), decisions take time.
This isn't meant as a defense, just a little illumination.
As for my opinion: communication has NEVER been their strength. You can tell that by the website. News updates should be right upfront on the website, not buried in a blog or emailed in a newsletter. (Good backups, but not for breaking news.)
The LLC, the BORG or the BMP (the new non-profit) should communicate with the BMan community more directly rather than through the local press or some panel discussion that got recorded by an audience member. There are seemingly official Twitter and Facebook accounts, but you don't see much news on them. In the absence of regular official communication, you get the BMan community's opinion and interpretation. Some of the community members are great speakers and very effective tweeters, but at times like the ticket debacle, official word is what's needed and appreciated.
Just my 2 cents...
(Full disclosure: received no tickets in the lottery)
Dustyrusty wrote:When all LLC decisions are made on a consensus basis (i.e. everybody has to agree), decisions take time.
This isn't meant as a defense, just a little illumination.
As for my opinion: communication has NEVER been their strength. You can tell that by the website. News updates should be right upfront on the website, not buried in a blog or emailed in a newsletter. (Good backups, but not for breaking news.)
Return to 2012 Tickets Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest