lemur wrote:Crossposting is the act of posting the same message to multiple information channels; forums, mailing lists, or newsgroups. Crossposting is perceived as inconsiderate[1], poor etiquette[2] and is banned from Usenet newsgroups and virtually all email lists.[3][4]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossposting
your cross posting is WORSE than an ugly RV !!!
liz-lemon wrote:I have seen a ton of RV’s and Party buses that are just there to spectate. The tourist buses are huge eye sores… and most of the people are not on vibe with the culture.
I think we should create a new rule before tickets go on sale:
NO standard RVs or tourist buses… They must be artistically modified or tailored to the event.
MyDearFriend wrote:I can't believe I'm taking shit from a meat-cake-with-teeth. :lol:
BBadger wrote:liz-lemon wrote:I have seen a ton of RV’s and Party buses that are just there to spectate. The tourist buses are huge eye sores… and most of the people are not on vibe with the culture.
I think we should create a new rule before tickets go on sale:
NO standard RVs or tourist buses… They must be artistically modified or tailored to the event.
I've got a better idea: let's ban all those people who think that those who attend Burning Man must fit a single mold ("A true burner camps out of a tent!"), the people who think that there should be a seniority system for tickets ("I'm a 9-year burner and I'm entitled to a ticket!"), the people who want a participation-quota for tickets ("Yo man, I made a fancy sign for my camp, unlike those lame fucks camping out of their Hondas who didn't bring anything!"), and any other Burnier-than-thou fucks who continue to infect this event.
BBadger wrote:Burnier-than-thou fucks who continue to infect this event.
karma_cat wrote:BBadger wrote:liz-lemon wrote:I have seen a ton of RV’s and Party buses that are just there to spectate. The tourist buses are huge eye sores… and most of the people are not on vibe with the culture.
I think we should create a new rule before tickets go on sale:
NO standard RVs or tourist buses… They must be artistically modified or tailored to the event.
I've got a better idea: let's ban all those people who think that those who attend Burning Man must fit a single mold ("A true burner camps out of a tent!"), the people who think that there should be a seniority system for tickets ("I'm a 9-year burner and I'm entitled to a ticket!"), the people who want a participation-quota for tickets ("Yo man, I made a fancy sign for my camp, unlike those lame fucks camping out of their Hondas who didn't bring anything!"), and any other Burnier-than-thou fucks who continue to infect this event.
Oh oh ... we could have a lottery for a limited number of RV slots!!!!
karma_cat wrote:lemur wrote:Crossposting is the act of posting the same message to multiple information channels; forums, mailing lists, or newsgroups. Crossposting is perceived as inconsiderate[1], poor etiquette[2] and is banned from Usenet newsgroups and virtually all email lists.[3][4]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossposting
your cross posting is WORSE than an ugly RV !!!
I've noticed that you've been cross-posting about how people shouldn't be cross-posting.
If cross-posting is bad ... is meta-cross-posting worse?
ZaphodBurner wrote:
The difference between buying a ticket from a scalper and prostituting yourself for one is, if you suck dick for a ticket and brag about it, burners will still respect you.
liz-lemon wrote:The only exception is you apply to bring them, much like how art cars work. Some people might need them for projects, so in those cases they could be allowed but for the most part people should be living in spaces designed for the event. I think this would discourage a lot of people who just bus in to party and eat up all the tickets. It would also really add to the artistic environment and culture.
liz-lemon wrote:Seems like everyone is a weeeee bit testy about their comfy cozy RVs….


liz-lemon wrote:Seems like everyone is a weeeee bit testy about their comfy cozy RVs….
trilobyte wrote: .....for many very active participants in BRC, rental RV's are their mode of transportation/habitation out there. It would be incredibly unfair to anyone traveling from great distances who doesn't have the extra week to be able to art up and then clean up a rental vehicle.
remi wrote:trilobyte wrote: .....for many very active participants in BRC, rental RV's are their mode of transportation/habitation out there. It would be incredibly unfair to anyone traveling from great distances who doesn't have the extra week to be able to art up and then clean up a rental vehicle.
Thank you. It's hard to art up a rental R.V. in a way that is 100% reversible... unless you want me to do a cheap, shit job. I'm going to try and bring over-the-top crazy costumes and I have an idea for a man-powered art vehicle, which I don't think would need to be registered with DMV if it's powered by pedallers (I believe it would fall under the same jurisdiction as a bike)... plus it's better for the environment.
trilobyte wrote:@Karma_cat - the pre-sale worked, identically to the way the main sale IS WORKING NOW. Don't take this the wrong way, but you've got a flawed understanding of success and failure here. The purpose of the process wasn't to have tickets for everyone, or to limit the number of registrants - that's just not possible. The system is designed to give everyone a 2 week window so that everyone who wants to and is able to get their stuff together can participate. Check. Then it gives the ticketing team and the ticketing vendor a window of time in which they can de-dupe the list, and scrub it for scalpers and scammers. Check. And then it does the random drawing to disperse the available tickets among the pool of registrants. Check for the pre-sale, and I anticipate that on Tuesday/Wednesday we'll see a check for the main sale. The big difference between the pre-sale and this one is that in the pre-sale, the number of registrants wasn't that much bigger than the pool of available tickets. If anything, lots of additional demand beyond supply is when the system does its thing even better. It sucks because everyone wants odds that are as close to 100% as they can get, but the system's working. As for tiers, there was a big reduction in the number of tiers this year. I suspect that the feeling was that eliminating the tiers, on top of all the other changes, would have been too much for many people to take, and that we'll see further reduction or even elimination of pricing tiers with next year's event.
karma_cat wrote:
Trilobyte ... I think its you and the other lotto defenders who seem to have a different definition of success from the rest of us.
karma_cat wrote:
Trilobyte ... I think its you and the other lotto defenders who seem to have a different definition of success from the rest of us. The reason this was a failure is that it created an atmosphere of fear and chaos while simultaneously creating a much greater impression of scarcity than actually exists. It is those things that cause the massive overbuying and which will probably taint the festival in future years because now that false increased sense of scarcity has been 'proven' for many people. However to be fair it WAS a success in terms of no server crashes and slightly disincentivizing scalpers. In fact I think the IDEA of a lottery can be quite good if it is done right.
The reason that I am so insistent on pointing out the huge flaws in the system is NOT to change the what's happening now, and its not to bitch. I want a system NEXT YEAR that can meet both of our definitions of success. In order to do that we need to be honest with ourselves and others about where things went right and where they went wrong.
So unless you, Lemur, Eric, and the other lotto defenders think this system is perfect and could never be improved upon ... lets make it better next year.
BeachBum wrote:I again agree with karma_cat, well said.
I think the ticket distribution system can be improved upon this year though.
My take is that there is going to be a firestorm generated in the next few days from large numbers of people who deeply care about the event and participate and provide their time and energy for art, art cars, interactive camps, ... , who don't get selected for tickets.
I hope the defenders of the current system, and the ones who ignored previous pleas of the obvious impending problems, are here to tell each one of them that the current system works![]()
One way to improve the system for this year is to have the tickets in the follow-on sale non-transferable and picked up only at will-call. I seem to remember that the last month or so of ticket sales in previous years were to be picked up at will call, so this is nothing very new.
BeachBum wrote:Lemur,
We disagree on how well the current ticket distribution system is going. I believe that the ticket distribution system should, without excluding anyone in specific, allow a method for participants who really care about this event and spend their time and effort to produce art, art cars, interactive camps, ..., to have an excellent shot of getting tickets without hassles. You don't. You have every right to hold that opinion.
We disagree on the potential of many very unhappy participants and contributors who deeply care about this event being denied tickets through the lottery and flooding these boards and less managed forums elsewhere in a few days. I see it as a problem, you don't. You have every right to hold that opinion.
I try to throw in my two cents with what i believe to be constructive suggestions. You aggressively shoot down anything and anybody you don't agree with, with your many hundreds of very critical comments. You have every right to do that.
But, it's not worth it to me to participate in discussions on these boards, despite the many wonderful people here, I won't be perusing these boards in the future, so there's no use for you to respond to this post. I wish you the best in life.
BeachBum wrote:Lemur,
We disagree on how well the current ticket distribution system is going. I believe that the ticket distribution system should, without excluding anyone in specific, allow a method for participants who really care about this event and spend their time and effort to produce art, art cars, interactive camps, ..., to have an excellent shot of getting tickets without hassles. You don't. You have every right to hold that opinion.
We disagree on the potential of many very unhappy participants and contributors who deeply care about this event being denied tickets through the lottery and flooding these boards and less managed forums elsewhere in a few days. I see it as a problem, you don't. You have every right to hold that opinion.
I try to throw in my two cents with what i believe to be constructive suggestions. You aggressively shoot down anything and anybody you don't agree with, with your many hundreds of very critical comments. You have every right to do that.
But, it's not worth it to me to participate in discussions on these boards, despite the many wonderful people here, I won't be perusing these boards in the future, so there's no use for you to respond to this post. I wish you the best in life.
karma_cat wrote:The reason this was a failure is that it created an atmosphere of fear and chaos while simultaneously creating a much greater impression of scarcity than actually exists. It is those things that cause the massive overbuying and which will probably taint the festival in future years because now that false increased sense of scarcity has been 'proven' for many people.
Return to 2012 Tickets Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests